Kadira vs Scout vs SignalFx

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kadira
Kadira

36
29
+ 1
15
Scout
Scout

54
43
+ 1
26
SignalFx
SignalFx

15
27
+ 1
10
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Kadira?

See what’s going on with your app with different performance metrics and traces. Kadira tracks all your client and server errors automatically. You can profile your app in production or locally with Kadira and analyze it using an easy-to-use CPU analyzer.

What is Scout?

Scout is application monitoring that points developers right to the source of problems: N+1 database queries, memory bloat, performance trends, and more. Scout eliminates much of the investigation part when performance woes occur.

What is SignalFx?

We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Kadira?
Why do developers choose Scout?
Why do developers choose SignalFx?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using Kadira?
What are the cons of using Scout?
What are the cons of using SignalFx?
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Kadira?
        What companies use Scout?
        What companies use SignalFx?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Kadira?
        What tools integrate with Scout?
        What tools integrate with SignalFx?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Kadira, Scout, and SignalFx?
        New Relic
        New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code.
        Datadog
        Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
        ruxit
        Ruxit is a all-in-one performance monitoring solution for cloud natives. In under five minutes customizable dashboard views show you your application's performance data.
        Librato
        Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.
        Skylight
        Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Kadira, Scout, and SignalFx
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Kadira, Scout, and SignalFx
        Avatar of coryvirok
        Co-Founder, CTO at Rollbar
        Review ofScoutScout

        We love Scout at Rollbar. Here's how we use it.

        Zero configuration monitoring for new hosts

        We have added Scout to our Ansible configuration for new host setup. So, when we provision a new machine, we get basic monitoring without any extra configuration. Once the host is up and running, we add it to the appropriate role in Scout and all of our monitoring plugins are magically deployed and enabled on the new host.

        Monitoring HTTP response codes

        One of the best things about Scout is how beautiful and therefore usable their graphs are. We have a Scout dashboard which shows all of our response codes which allows us to quickly see connections between different hosts when problems occur.

        Custom plugins!

        Scout's plugin model makes it really easy to extend. We have implemented our own log monitoring plugin which reports metrics like the 90th percentile of slow queries on our site. These types of plugins allow us to see issues at a glance during deploys, maintenance and load spikes.

        Slowly taking over Nagios

        Nagios is amazing, but let's be real... Anyone who has used it knows how painful it is to set up, administer and extend. We are in the process of cutting over from Nagios to Scout to handle more of our infrastructure monitoring and soon, alerting.

        Review ofScoutScout

        I'm a freelance developer with a handful of servers that needed insightful monitoring and alerts. I searched high and low across both hosted and self hosted solutions... paid and open source. While many are quite capable the self-hosted solutions were clunky and overkill. The few self-hosted for pay solutions costs structure were completely outside of a freelances budget. ScoutApp is the first that had the easy to use setup, amazing plugins for specific app monitoring and the price was actually affordable. Setup couldn't be easier. Plugins are handled amazingly with a single click that initiates the agent to install remotely. The interface is minimal and easy to read. Triggers are so well done and easy to setup with clear human language detailing the alert criteria. Real-time graphing is just icing on the cake.

        ScoutApp is great for not just small but enterprise level infrastructures as well. Added features such as roles, multi-user accounts, environments and even an API make growing with it a no brainer.

        Very well done and highly recommended.

        Avatar of manavo
        Doorbell.io
        Review ofScoutScout

        I used to have NewRelic on https://doorbell.io for my monitoring. It worked pretty well for the basic things, and the basic plan is free.

        However, as https://doorbell.io's stack got increasingly complicated, the plugins of NewRelic didn't work as well as I needed, in order to reliably monitor all aspects of the platform.

        I decided to try out Scout as an alternative, since even though it doesn't have a free plan, the basic plan is only $8/month (compared to $149 for NewRelic).

        I found the interface to be really good, and they have great documentation. I found plugins for every single part of my stack, and they all worked very easily "out of the box". And best of all, added practically no overhead to the server!

        So overall, I'd say it's a service that's well worth paying for. It's a steal at $8/month!

        Review ofScoutScout

        We migrated our infrastructure monitoring to Scout about six months ago when our previous monitoring solution became unreliable and cumbersome to maintain. We were pleasantly surprised at the ease of implementation and the library of plugins already available.

        The fine grain polling frequency and long term metric logging helped us maintain the high level of uptime our application requires. Moreover, due to the nature of the Scout protocol, changes to our specific application monitoring can be configured at a high level in their interface with a few clicks.

        For the few times we have been in communication with their support team to help sort our questions or clarify details, we have been thoroughly impressed at their response time and personalized attention to our needs.

        We highly recommend using Scout.

        Review ofScoutScout

        We are a very small non profit with a very simple server setup. Our two developers do not have any special training as sys admins. But it was very easy to get setup with Scout and start some simple monitoring of our servers. Most of what we do is check that some key processes are running and that our URLs are up. It was easy to do all of that with Scout. That said: we're interested in learning more about Scout's capabilities and doing more sophisticated server monitoring down the line.

        How developers use Kadira, Scout, and SignalFx
        Avatar of The Lens
        The Lens uses ScoutScout

        We are a very small non profit with a very simple server setup. Our two developers do not have any special training as sys admins. That said, it was very simple to get setup with Scout and start some simple monitoring of our servers. Most of what we do is check that some key processes are running and that our URLs are up. But we're interested in learning more aboutS Scout's capabilities/ doing more sophisticated server monitoring down the line.

        Avatar of SignalFx
        SignalFx uses SignalFxSignalFx

        We use SignalFx to monitor all of SignalFx.. that include the entire stack from core services like Cassandra and AWS EC2 up through custom application metrics from SignalFx itself.

        Avatar of cloak.ly
        cloak.ly uses KadiraKadira

        Kadira is used for production monitoring.

        How much does Kadira cost?
        How much does Scout cost?
        How much does SignalFx cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about SignalFx
        More news