StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Kafka vs WSO2

Kafka vs WSO2

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
WSO2
WSO2
Stacks84
Followers164
Votes0
GitHub Stars932
Forks862

Kafka vs WSO2: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Kafka and WSO2. Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that is designed to handle high volumes of real-time data feeds with low latency. On the other hand, WSO2 is an open-source integration platform and middleware solution that provides various tools and features for enterprise integration.

  1. Scalability: One of the key differences between Kafka and WSO2 is scalability. Kafka is built for high scalability and can handle very large data streams across multiple nodes. It allows for horizontal scaling by adding more Kafka brokers to the cluster. On the other hand, WSO2 is also scalable but may have some limitations when it comes to handling extremely large data volumes.

  2. Message Persistence: Kafka and WSO2 also differ in their approach to data persistence. Kafka stores messages on disk for a configurable amount of time, providing durability and fault tolerance. This allows for replaying of messages in case of failures. However, WSO2 typically relies on external databases or message brokers for message persistence and may not have built-in durability features like Kafka.

  3. Event Streaming vs Integration: Another difference between Kafka and WSO2 is their primary focus. Kafka is primarily focused on event streaming and real-time data processing. It is widely used for building streaming applications and data pipelines. On the other hand, WSO2 is more focused on enterprise integration, providing a wide range of features and tools for connecting systems and applications.

  4. Data Processing Model: Kafka and WSO2 also differ in their data processing models. Kafka follows a publish-subscribe model, where producers write messages to topics and consumers subscribe to topics to consume the messages. It provides a real-time stream processing framework called Kafka Streams for processing the data. WSO2, on the other hand, follows a message-driven integration model, where messages are routed and transformed between different systems using message brokers and mediation capabilities.

  5. Community Support and Ecosystem: Kafka and WSO2 also differ in terms of community support and ecosystem. Kafka has a large and active community, with a wide range of connectors, libraries, and tools available. It integrates well with other technologies like Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark. WSO2 also has an active community, but its ecosystem may not be as extensive as Kafka's, particularly in terms of third-party connectors and integrations.

  6. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: The ease of use and learning curve is another differentiating factor between Kafka and WSO2. Kafka has a relatively steeper learning curve, as it requires an understanding of distributed systems and concepts like topics, partitions, and consumer groups. WSO2, on the other hand, provides a more user-friendly and visual interface for building integrations, making it easier for developers with less experience in distributed systems.

In summary, Kafka and WSO2 differ in terms of scalability, message persistence, primary focus, data processing models, community support and ecosystem, as well as ease of use and learning curve. While Kafka excels in event streaming and scalability, WSO2 provides a comprehensive set of tools for enterprise integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, WSO2

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.8k views10.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
WSO2
WSO2

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
100% Open Source;Largest Platform Built on Single Code Base;Cloud Enabled;Premium Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
932
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
862
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
84
Followers
22.3K
Followers
164
Votes
607
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Segment
Segment
Zapier
Zapier
Postman
Postman

What are some alternatives to Kafka, WSO2?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase