StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Karate DSL vs Selenide

Karate DSL vs Selenide

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Stacks148
Followers268
Votes85

Karate DSL vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Developers describe Karate DSL as "Open Source Web-Services Test Automation Framework". Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing. On the other hand, Selenide is detailed as "Concise UI tests in JAVA". It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Karate DSL and Selenide can be categorized as "Testing Frameworks" tools.

Some of the features offered by Karate DSL are:

  • Native support for both JSON and XML
  • Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"
  • Data-driven testing

On the other hand, Selenide provides the following key features:

  • Concise fluent API for tests
  • Ajax support for stable tests
  • Powerful selectors

Karate DSL is an open source tool with 2.28K GitHub stars and 579 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Karate DSL's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Karate DSL has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3 company stacks & 8 developers stacks; compared to Selenide, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenide, Karate DSL

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenide
Selenide
Karate DSL
Karate DSL

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
56
Stacks
148
Followers
85
Followers
268
Votes
16
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    File upload support
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
Pros
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Easy parameterized configuration / custom variables
Cons
  • 1
    Confusing report: Summarized by steps and not by featur
  • 1
    Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
  • 1
    Karate uses its own scripting language
  • 1
    There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
  • 1
    Finding errors in code is not easy
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
Cucumber
Cucumber
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Selenide, Karate DSL?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana