Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kitematic vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Development Focus: One key difference between Kitematic and Kubernetes is their focus. Kitematic is primarily aimed at developers who want a simple way to set up and manage Docker containers on their local machine, with a user-friendly interface. In contrast, Kubernetes targets enterprises and DevOps teams looking to deploy, scale, and manage containerized applications in a production environment.
Orchestration Capabilities: Another important distinction lies in their orchestration capabilities. Kitematic lacks native support for orchestrating containers across multiple nodes, making it more suitable for individual developers or small projects. On the other hand, Kubernetes excels in orchestrating containers at scale, offering features like automated scaling, load balancing, and self-healing capabilities.
Scalability and High Availability: Kubernetes is designed to be highly scalable and fault-tolerant, allowing organizations to deploy and manage complex containerized applications across a cluster of machines. In contrast, Kitematic is more suited for local development or small-scale projects, lacking the robust scalability and high availability features of Kubernetes.
Resource Management: Kubernetes provides advanced resource management features, such as fine-grained control over CPU and memory allocation, allowing users to optimize the performance of their containerized applications. Kitematic, on the other hand, offers basic resource management capabilities, making it less suitable for optimizing resource utilization in production environments.
Community and Ecosystem: Kubernetes boasts a large and active open-source community, with extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of third-party integrations and plugins available. This rich ecosystem enables users to customize and extend Kubernetes according to their specific requirements. In comparison, Kitematic has a smaller community and limited ecosystem support, which may restrict its flexibility and extensibility.
Complexity and Learning Curve: Kubernetes is known for its complexity and steep learning curve, requiring users to have a deep understanding of container orchestration concepts and configurations. In contrast, Kitematic simplifies the process of managing Docker containers with its intuitive GUI, making it more beginner-friendly but less feature-rich and powerful than Kubernetes.
In Summary, the key differences between Kitematic and Kubernetes lie in their focus on development, orchestration capabilities, scalability, resource management, community support, and complexity.
Hello, we have a bunch of local hosts (Linux and Windows) where Docker containers are running with bamboo agents on them. Currently, each container is installed as a system service. Each host is set up manually. I want to improve the system by adding some sort of orchestration software that should install, update and check for consistency in my docker containers. I don't need any clouds, all hosts are local. I'd prefer simple solutions. What orchestration system should I choose?
If you just want the basic orchestration between a set of defined hosts, go with Docker Swarm. If you want more advanced orchestration + flexibility in terms of resource management and load balancing go with Kubernetes. In both cases, you can make it even more complex while making the whole architecture more understandable and replicable by using Terraform.
We develop rapidly with docker-compose orchestrated services, however, for production - we utilise the very best ideas that Kubernetes has to offer: SCALE! We can scale when needed, setting a maximum and minimum level of nodes for each application layer - scaling only when the load balancer needs it. This allowed us to reduce our devops costs by 40% whilst also maintaining an SLA of 99.87%.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Kitematic
- I like it because it sucks8
- No command line, Docker in one app, gui, easy to set up3
- Good for first timer2
- Easy to get started1
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful130
- Open source108
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services26
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Cheap8
- Simple8
- Self-healing7
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Custom and extensibility3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kitematic
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Kitematic?
What is Kubernetes?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Kitematic?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Kitematic?
What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+1
+2
+9
+11
+11+7
+12
+2