Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kubernetes

60.4K
52.2K
+ 1
685
Tectonic

6
26
+ 1
0
Add tool

Kubernetes vs Tectonic: What are the differences?

Kubernetes vs Tectonic

Kubernetes and Tectonic are both popular container orchestration platforms, but they have some key differences. Let's explore these differences in detail:

  1. Architecture: Kubernetes follows a master-worker architecture, where there is a central control plane (master) that manages multiple worker nodes. Tectonic, on the other hand, builds upon Kubernetes and adds more components for enterprise-grade features like monitoring, logging, and security.

  2. Ease of Deployment: Kubernetes can be complex to set up and deploy, requiring manual configuration of various components. Tectonic, however, provides an installer that simplifies the deployment process by automating the setup and configuration of Kubernetes and its additional components.

  3. Support and Maintenance: Kubernetes is community-driven and has a large user base, which means there is extensive community support available. Tectonic, being a commercial offering by CoreOS, provides enterprise-level support and maintenance services along with regular updates and bug fixes.

  4. Additional Features: While Kubernetes provides a solid foundation for container orchestration, Tectonic extends it with additional features like integrated monitoring and logging solutions, enhanced security controls, and a web-based user interface for easier management and visibility into the cluster.

  5. Vendor Lock-In: Kubernetes is an open-source platform that is not tied to any specific vendor, allowing users the flexibility to choose their underlying infrastructure. Tectonic, on the other hand, is associated with CoreOS and its ecosystem, which may lead to a certain level of vendor lock-in.

  6. Pricing: Kubernetes is free to use, being an open-source project. However, if you opt for the managed Kubernetes services offered by cloud providers, you may incur charges for the resources used. Tectonic, being a commercial product, comes with pricing based on the number of nodes deployed and additional support services.

In summary, Kubernetes is a widely adopted open-source container orchestration platform, whereas Tectonic is a commercial product that extends Kubernetes with enterprise-grade features and services. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements, ease of deployment, desired additional features, maintenance support, and pricing considerations.

Decisions about Kubernetes and Tectonic
Michael Roberts

We develop rapidly with docker-compose orchestrated services, however, for production - we utilise the very best ideas that Kubernetes has to offer: SCALE! We can scale when needed, setting a maximum and minimum level of nodes for each application layer - scaling only when the load balancer needs it. This allowed us to reduce our devops costs by 40% whilst also maintaining an SLA of 99.87%.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.2M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Kubernetes
Pros of Tectonic
  • 166
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 130
    Simple and powerful
  • 108
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 26
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 8
    Simple
  • 7
    Self-healing
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 2
    Expandable
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Kubernetes
    Cons of Tectonic
    • 16
      Steep learning curve
    • 15
      Poor workflow for development
    • 8
      Orchestrates only infrastructure
    • 4
      High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
    • 2
      Too heavy for simple systems
    • 1
      Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
    • 1
      More moving parts to secure
    • 1
      Additional Technology Overhead
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      824
      3.9K
      58.3K
      87
      5

      What is Kubernetes?

      Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

      What is Tectonic?

      A CoreOS + Kubernetes platform to run Linux containers.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Kubernetes?
      What companies use Tectonic?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
      What tools integrate with Tectonic?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Kubernetesetcd+2
      2
      1219
      Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

      DigitalOcean

      GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
      2
      2496
      PythonDockerKubernetes+7
      3
      1192
      May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
      5
      1567
      Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesRancher+2
      2
      1000
      What are some alternatives to Kubernetes and Tectonic?
      Docker Swarm
      Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
      Nomad
      Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.
      OpenStack
      OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
      Rancher
      Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
      Docker Compose
      With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
      See all alternatives