StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. KVM vs VMware vSphere

KVM vs VMware vSphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Stacks608
Followers550
Votes30
KVM
KVM
Stacks189
Followers234
Votes8

KVM vs VMware vSphere: What are the differences?

<The hypervisor space is highly competitive, with KVM and VMware vSphere being two popular choices for virtualization. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between KVM and VMware vSphere.>

1. **Architecture**: KVM is a type 1 hypervisor, meaning it runs directly on the host's hardware. On the other hand, VMware vSphere is a type 2 hypervisor that runs on top of an operating system. This architectural difference can have implications for performance and resource utilization.
2. **Open Source vs. Proprietary**: KVM is an open-source solution, which means it's free to use and modify. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, is a proprietary software that comes with licensing fees. Organizations must consider their budget and flexibility requirements when choosing between the two options.
3. **Virtualization Management**: VMware vSphere comes with a comprehensive suite of management tools, making it easier to manage virtualized environments. While KVM also has management tools available, they may not be as feature-rich or user-friendly as VMware's offerings.
4. **Scalability**: VMware vSphere is known for its scalability, supporting large-scale virtualized environments with ease. KVM, while capable of scaling to a certain extent, may not have the same level of scalability as VMware vSphere in enterprise-level deployments.
5. **Support and Ecosystem**: VMware vSphere has a well-established support system and a vast ecosystem of third-party tools and integrations. This can be advantageous for organizations that require extensive support and integration capabilities. KVM, being open source, relies more on community support and may have limited third-party integrations.
6. **Compatibility**: When it comes to compatibility with different operating systems and applications, VMware vSphere tends to have better support due to its widespread adoption and testing. KVM may have limitations in terms of compatibility, especially with certain legacy applications or niche platforms.

In Summary, KVM and VMware vSphere differ in architecture, licensing, management tools, scalability, support ecosystem, and compatibility. Organizations should carefully evaluate their requirements to choose the right virtualization solution for their needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
KVM
KVM

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Powerful Server Virtualization;Network Services;Efficient Storage;Consistent Automation;High Availability;Robust Security
-
Statistics
Stacks
608
Stacks
189
Followers
550
Followers
234
Votes
30
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great Networking
Cons
  • 9
    Price
Pros
  • 4
    No license issues
  • 2
    Flexible network options
  • 2
    Very fast

What are some alternatives to VMware vSphere, KVM?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana