Overview

Let's Encrypt

Stacks1.6K

Followers974

Votes98

ORY Hydra

Stacks23

Followers157

Votes8

GitHub Stars16.6K

Forks1.6K

Let's Encrypt vs ORY Hydra: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Let's Encrypt and ORY Hydra are both popular tools in the field of web security, but they have key differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and features. 

1. **Certificate Types**: Let's Encrypt primarily issues TLS/SSL certificates for securing websites, while ORY Hydra is an OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect provider for securing APIs and microservices. This difference in focus highlights the specific use cases each tool is designed for. 

2. **Automated Renewal**: Let's Encrypt offers automated certificate renewal, ensuring that websites remain secure without manual intervention. ORY Hydra, on the other hand, does not provide automated renewal for its OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect tokens, requiring developers to implement their own renewal processes.

3. **Scalability**: ORY Hydra is designed with scalability in mind, allowing it to handle high volumes of requests efficiently. Let's Encrypt, while scalable on its own, may require additional infrastructure for managing large-scale deployments due to its focus on individual website certificates.

4. **Configuration Flexibility**: ORY Hydra offers extensive configuration options for customizing the behavior of OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect flows, providing developers with greater control over the security aspects of their APIs. Let's Encrypt, in comparison, has a more standardized configuration process for issuing TLS/SSL certificates.

5. **Community Support**: Let's Encrypt is a widely adopted open-source project with a large community of users and contributors, making it easier to find resources and assistance. ORY Hydra also has a supportive community but may have a smaller user base due to its specialized use case.

6. **Integration Capabilities**: ORY Hydra integrates seamlessly with existing identity management systems and API gateways, making it a preferred choice for organizations with complex infrastructures. Let's Encrypt, while compatible with various web servers and platforms, may require additional integration efforts for specific use cases.

In Summary, Let's Encrypt focuses on website security with automated certificate renewal, while ORY Hydra specializes in securing APIs and microservices with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect capabilities, offering scalability, configuration flexibility, and integration capabilities tailored to those specific needs.

🔥 Trending in SSL Certificates on StackShare

Smallstep Certificate Manager Ssl Certificates

Complete certificate lifecycle management for all your workloads, devices, and developers

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Detailed Comparison

Let's Encrypt	ORY Hydra
It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).	It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.
-	OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server;OpenID Connect certified;Flexible User Management;High Performance;Developer Friendly
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 16.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.6K
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 23
Followers 974	Followers 157
Votes 98	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
Pros 48 Open Source SSL 32 Simple setup 9 Microservices 9 Free 0 Easy ssl certificates	Pros 4 Open-source 2 Fully customizable 2 Scalable
Integrations
MongoDB Shopify axios	ORY Kratos Docker Node.js JavaScript TypeScript Golang Ruby Python Java PHP

What are some alternatives to Let's Encrypt, ORY Hydra?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.