Let's Encrypt vs Veracode | What are the differences? | StackShare

Let's Encrypt vs Veracode

Overview

Let's Encrypt

Stacks1.6K

Followers974

Votes98

Veracode

Stacks66

Followers129

Votes0

Let's Encrypt vs Veracode: What are the differences?

Let's Encrypt: A free, automated, and open Certificate Authority (CA). Let’s Encrypt is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG); Veracode: A simpler and more scalable way to increase the resiliency of your global application infrastructure. It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.

Let's Encrypt and Veracode can be primarily classified as "Security" tools.

🔥 Trending in SSL Certificates on StackShare

Smallstep Certificate Manager Ssl Certificates

Complete certificate lifecycle management for all your workloads, devices, and developers

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Let's Encrypt	Veracode
It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).	It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.
-	Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 66
Followers 974	Followers 129
Votes 98	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 48 Open Source SSL 32 Simple setup 9 Microservices 9 Free 0 Easy ssl certificates	No community feedback yet
Integrations
MongoDB Shopify axios	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins Bitbucket Travis CI Apache Ant Appveyor

What are some alternatives to Let's Encrypt, Veracode?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.