Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Ant

181
151
+ 1
7
Make

302
129
+ 1
1
Add tool

Apache Ant vs Make: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Ant and Make are both build automation tools that are used to compile and build software projects. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Language: Apache Ant is written in XML while Make uses a domain-specific language. This means that Ant builds are defined using XML tags, making it more readable and easier to understand. On the other hand, Make uses a script-like language that can be more flexible but also more complex to work with.

  2. Platform Independence: Apache Ant is platform-independent, meaning that build scripts written in Ant can be executed on any operating system. Make, on the other hand, was originally designed for Unix-like systems and may require modifications to work on different platforms.

  3. Dependency Management: Ant has built-in support for dependency management, allowing developers to specify dependencies between different parts of the build process. Make, on the other hand, requires manual dependency tracking, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.

  4. Task Execution Model: Ant's task execution model is based on the concept of targets, which define a set of tasks to be executed. Make, on the other hand, uses a different model where tasks are defined as dependencies of other tasks. This can lead to differences in how build scripts are written and executed.

  5. Ease of Use: Ant is often considered easier to use and to set up compared to Make. This is partly because Ant's build scripts are written in XML, which can be more intuitive for developers who are already familiar with HTML or other markup languages. Make, on the other hand, requires developers to learn a new scripting language.

  6. Community and Documentation: Ant has a larger and more active community compared to Make, which means that there are more resources and support available. Ant also has comprehensive documentation and a wide range of plugins and tools that can be used to extend its functionality. Make, on the other hand, may have fewer resources and support options available.

In Summary, Apache Ant and Make have key differences in their language, platform independence, dependency management, task execution model, ease of use, and community support.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Apache Ant
Pros of Make
  • 4
    Flexible
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Easy to write own java-build-hooks
  • 1
    No-nonsense approach to builds. Just works
  • 0
    One-line Execution

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Apache Ant
Cons of Make
  • 1
    Slow
  • 1
    Old and not widely used anymore
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Apache Ant?

    Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

    What is Make?

    The GNU Compiler Collection and GNU Toolchain (Binutils, GDB, GLIBC)

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Apache Ant?
    What companies use Make?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Apache Ant?
    What tools integrate with Make?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Apache Ant and Make?
    Eclipse
    Standard Eclipse package suited for Java and plug-in development plus adding new plugins; already includes Git, Marketplace Client, source code and developer documentation. Click here to file a bug against Eclipse Platform.
    Gradle
    Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.
    Apache Maven
    Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
    Apache Tomcat
    Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    See all alternatives