Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebird vs MariaDB: What are the differences?
Comparison between Firebird and MariaDB
Firebird and MariaDB are two popular open-source relational database management systems. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other.
Architecture: Firebird follows a client-server architecture, where the server manages all database operations, and clients interact with it. On the other hand, MariaDB utilizes a traditional relational database management system architecture, where clients directly interact with the server.
Data Types: Firebird has a distinct set of data types, including BLOBs (Binary Large Objects), arrays, and compound types like STRUCT and RECORD. MariaDB, on the other hand, offers a wider range of standard data types, including several numeric, date/time, and string types.
Security: Firebird supports role-based security, where users are assigned specific roles that determine their access privileges. In MariaDB, access privileges are granted at the user level, allowing for more fine-grained control over permissions.
Replication: MariaDB offers several options for replication, including asynchronous and synchronous replication. Firebird, on the other hand, does not have built-in replication capabilities, but it can be achieved through third-party tools.
Transaction Management: Firebird uses a multi-generational architecture, where old versions of data are kept during transactions. This allows for consistent read access during ongoing transactions. MariaDB uses a traditional locking-based approach for transaction management.
Stored Procedures: MariaDB supports stored procedures, which are precompiled sets of SQL statements that can be executed repeatedly. Firebird also supports stored procedures but requires the use of triggers and functions to achieve similar functionality.
In summary, Firebird and MariaDB differ in their architecture, data types, security mechanisms, replication options, transaction management approaches, and stored procedures implementation.
Hi all. I am an informatics student, and I need to realise a simple website for my friend. I am planning to realise the website using Node.js and Mongoose, since I have already done a project using these technologies. I also know SQL, and I have used PostgreSQL and MySQL previously.
The website will show a possible travel destination and local transportation. The database is used to store information about traveling, so only admin will manage the content (especially photos). While clients will see the content uploaded by the admin. I am planning to use Mongoose because it is very simple and efficient for this project. Please give me your opinion about this choice.
Your requirements seem nothing special. on the other hand, MongoDB is commonly used with Node. you could use Mongo without defining a Schema, does it give you any benefits? Also, note that development speed matters. In most cases RDBMS are the best choice, Learn and use Postgres for life!
The use case you are describing would benefit from a self-hosted headless CMS like contentful. You can also go for Strapi with a database of your choice but here you would have to host Strapi and the underlying database (if not using SQLite) yourself. If you want to use Strapi, you can ease your work by using something like PlanetSCaleDB as the backing database for Strapi.
Any database will be a great choice for your app, which is less of a technical challenge and more about great content. Go for it, the geographical search features maybe be actually handy for you.
MongoDB and Mongoose are commonly used with Node.js and the use case doesn't seem to be requiring any special considerations as of now. However using MongoDB now will allow you to easily expand and modify your use case in future.
If not MongoDB, then my second choice will be PostgreSQL. It's a generic purpose database with jsonb support (if you need it) and lots of resources online. Nobody was fired for choosing PostgreSQL.
SQL is not so good at query lat long out of the box. you might need to use additional tools for that like UTM coordinates or Uber's H3.
If you use mongoDB, it support 2d coordinate query out of the box.
Hi, Maxim! Most likely, the site is almost ready. But we would like to share our development with you. https://falcon.web-automation.ru/ This is a constructor for web application. With it, you can create almost any site with different roles which have different levels of access to information and different functionality. The platform is managed via sql. knowing sql, you will be able to change the business logic as necessary and during further project maintenance. We will be glad to hear your feedback about the platform.
Any database engine should work well but I vote for Postgres because of PostGIS extension that may be handy for travel related site. There's nothing special about your requirements.
We actually use both Mongo and SQL databases in production. Mongo excels in both speed and developer friendliness when it comes to geospatial data and queries on the geospatial data, but we also like ACID compliance hence most of our other data (except on-site logs) are stored in a SQL Database (MariaDB for now)
Pros of Firebird
- Free3
- Open-Source3
- Upgrade from MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL1
- Easy Setup1
- Great Performance1
Pros of MariaDB
- Drop-in mysql replacement149
- Great performance100
- Open source74
- Free55
- Easy setup44
- Easy and fast15
- Lead developer is "monty" widenius the founder of mysql14
- Also an aws rds service6
- Consistent and robust4
- Learning curve easy4
- Native JSON Support / Dynamic Columns2
- Real Multi Threaded queries on a table/db1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebird
- Speed2