Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design Lite vs Material UI: What are the differences?
Introduction
Material Design Lite (MDL) and Material UI (MUI) are two popular libraries for implementing Material Design in web applications. While they share the same design principles and provide similar components, there are key differences between them that make each unique. In this Markdown document, we will highlight these differences in six paragraphs.
Components and Features: MDL provides a set of pre-built components and features that are ready to use out of the box. It focuses on simplicity and lightweight implementation, making it a good choice for smaller projects or websites that do not need advanced functionality. MUI, on the other hand, offers a wider range of components and features, including more complex elements like data grids and tables. It caters to larger projects and applications that require more advanced functionality.
Customization and Theming: MDL offers limited customization options, with predefined styles that can be easily applied to components. It follows a strict design language, making it ideal for maintaining consistency across different projects. MUI, on the other hand, provides extensive customization and theming capabilities. It allows developers to easily override styles, modify components, and create their own themes, providing more flexibility and control over the design.
Installation and Setup: MDL can be quickly set up by including the necessary CSS and JavaScript files in the project. It does not require a build tool or package manager, making it easy to integrate with existing projects. MUI, on the other hand, requires a more involved setup process. It is typically installed using a package manager like npm or yarn and requires a build tool like webpack or Babel for transpiling and bundling the code.
Community and Documentation: MDL has a large and active community of developers, with comprehensive documentation and a wide range of tutorials and resources available online. It has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem. MUI, although relatively newer, also has a growing community and a well-maintained documentation. It benefits from the popularity of React, the JavaScript library it is built upon, and has a strong developer community supporting it.
Browser Compatibility: MDL is designed to work on a wide range of browsers, including older versions that may not support modern web standards. It provides graceful degradation, ensuring that the components still function correctly even on older browsers. MUI, being built on React, requires a modern browser that supports ES6 and other modern web technologies. It does not provide support for older browsers out of the box.
Integration with JavaScript Frameworks: MDL can be easily integrated with different JavaScript frameworks, including React, Angular, and Vue. It provides guidance and examples for each of these frameworks. MUI, being built on React, is inherently designed for seamless integration with React projects. It provides a set of React components that can be easily used in a React application, but integrating it with other frameworks may require additional effort.
In summary, MDL is a lightweight and simple library with limited customization options, ideal for smaller projects, while MUI offers a wider range of components and extensive customization capabilities, making it suitable for larger and more complex applications. MDL is easy to set up and works on a wide range of browsers, including older ones, whereas MUI requires a more involved setup process and supports modern browsers only. Both libraries have active communities and comprehensive documentation available online.
My React website is a simple 5-pager that attaches to a database to store and display registrations and other data. The user (small user base) can change any form elements, but I don't need theme-ing, though that would be fun for the user. reactstrap/react-bootstrap built on Bootstrap 4 sounds dated. I am familiar with reactstrap, but a friend said to try Material-UI. The thought of learning it is interesting, but somehow I think it might be overkill. So... reactstrap, react-bootstrap, or Material UI, which should I use?
MaterialUI may be overkill for such a simple project, you're right. So I'm recommending both tools in this StackShare form.
But if it's planned to increase the project, consider migrating it to MUI in advance. Among its pros I can name: - brilliant TS support - all popular use cases covered - well documented - backed by sponsors == will live and be maintained
I recommend Material-UI for a couple reasons. 1. It’s very easy to throw MUI into React. You can essentially just import the components you need in place of yours. Effectively, for a button, for example, you can swap out <button for MUI’s <Button and you can be done if that’s all you want. Looks great, no hassle, and they have simple guides to help you make good UI decisions on top of that. 2. It’s pretty up-to-date, and it has great docs. I use MUI all the time, and if I were doing a simple, small user-base app, I would definitely use it for the sake of convenience and speed of development.
I've used material UI and had great success with it on React projects. Semantic UI is also another great option https://semantic-ui.com/.
When you say its "overkill", I would think long term. I do a lot of small projects not only for the purpose of the project, but also for learning, future projects and to use professionaly. It's a long-term investment.
Material-UI looks great and is easy to use. Highly recommended, my favourite UI framework for React.
Much more modern in terms on support for css in js. But go for v5 not v4 as material-ui is going through a transition in term of its own implementation
Material-UI is the good choice for a small project. It's fast for development, maintenance, and is ready to use. It HaveMaterial-UI is the good choice for a small project. It's fast for development, maintenance, and is ready to use. Has an excellent documentation with pratic examples.
Chakra UI seems like the perfect fit in my opinion. It has a much powerful design system, all the necessary components and it is dead simple to learn. And pretty easy to customize too.
It's totally the design decision if you like to follow bootstrap design then you should go for reactstrap. But if you want to follow google material design then you should go for material ui.
I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.
As our team will be building a web application, HTML5
and CSS3
are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI
comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS
. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.
Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.
https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085
Pros of Material Design Lite
- Material Design straight from the original creators23
- Based on bem philosophy11
- Nice animations9
- SCSS7
- Simple Material Design5
- Doesn't depend on JavaScript5
- Custom color palette generates CDN2
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component26
- Looks great15
- Responsive13
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Flexible6
- Code examples6
- JSS5
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Interface3
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Accessibility1
- Easy to work with1
- Css1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design Lite
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation36
- Hard to customize29
- Hard to understand Docs22
- Bad performance9
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1