StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design Lite vs Material UI

Material Design Lite vs Material UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite
Stacks697
Followers394
Votes62
GitHub Stars32.2K
Forks5.0K

Material Design Lite vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material Design Lite (MDL) and Material UI (MUI) are two popular libraries for implementing Material Design in web applications. While they share the same design principles and provide similar components, there are key differences between them that make each unique. In this Markdown document, we will highlight these differences in six paragraphs.

  1. Components and Features: MDL provides a set of pre-built components and features that are ready to use out of the box. It focuses on simplicity and lightweight implementation, making it a good choice for smaller projects or websites that do not need advanced functionality. MUI, on the other hand, offers a wider range of components and features, including more complex elements like data grids and tables. It caters to larger projects and applications that require more advanced functionality.

  2. Customization and Theming: MDL offers limited customization options, with predefined styles that can be easily applied to components. It follows a strict design language, making it ideal for maintaining consistency across different projects. MUI, on the other hand, provides extensive customization and theming capabilities. It allows developers to easily override styles, modify components, and create their own themes, providing more flexibility and control over the design.

  3. Installation and Setup: MDL can be quickly set up by including the necessary CSS and JavaScript files in the project. It does not require a build tool or package manager, making it easy to integrate with existing projects. MUI, on the other hand, requires a more involved setup process. It is typically installed using a package manager like npm or yarn and requires a build tool like webpack or Babel for transpiling and bundling the code.

  4. Community and Documentation: MDL has a large and active community of developers, with comprehensive documentation and a wide range of tutorials and resources available online. It has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem. MUI, although relatively newer, also has a growing community and a well-maintained documentation. It benefits from the popularity of React, the JavaScript library it is built upon, and has a strong developer community supporting it.

  5. Browser Compatibility: MDL is designed to work on a wide range of browsers, including older versions that may not support modern web standards. It provides graceful degradation, ensuring that the components still function correctly even on older browsers. MUI, being built on React, requires a modern browser that supports ES6 and other modern web technologies. It does not provide support for older browsers out of the box.

  6. Integration with JavaScript Frameworks: MDL can be easily integrated with different JavaScript frameworks, including React, Angular, and Vue. It provides guidance and examples for each of these frameworks. MUI, being built on React, is inherently designed for seamless integration with React projects. It provides a set of React components that can be easily used in a React application, but integrating it with other frameworks may require additional effort.

In summary, MDL is a lightweight and simple library with limited customization options, ideal for smaller projects, while MUI offers a wider range of components and extensive customization capabilities, making it suitable for larger and more complex applications. MDL is easy to set up and works on a wide range of browsers, including older ones, whereas MUI requires a more involved setup process and supports modern browsers only. Both libraries have active communities and comprehensive documentation available online.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Material Design Lite

Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments
Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments
Max
Max

Apr 26, 2021

Review

MaterialUI may be overkill for such a simple project, you're right. So I'm recommending both tools in this StackShare form.

But if it's planned to increase the project, consider migrating it to MUI in advance. Among its pros I can name:

  • brilliant TS support
  • all popular use cases covered
  • well documented
  • backed by sponsors == will live and be maintained
46.9k views46.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Blog template;Dashboard template;Text heavy webpage template; Stand alone article template;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
32.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
697
Followers
3.7K
Followers
394
Votes
445
Votes
62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    Extra library needed for date/time pickers
Pros
  • 23
    Material Design straight from the original creators
  • 11
    Based on bem philosophy
  • 9
    Nice animations
  • 7
    SCSS
  • 5
    Simple Material Design
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Material Design Lite?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase