Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Material Design Lite

690
394
+ 1
62
Material-UI

2.3K
3.6K
+ 1
445
Add tool

Material Design Lite vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material Design Lite (MDL) and Material UI (MUI) are two popular libraries for implementing Material Design in web applications. While they share the same design principles and provide similar components, there are key differences between them that make each unique. In this Markdown document, we will highlight these differences in six paragraphs.

  1. Components and Features: MDL provides a set of pre-built components and features that are ready to use out of the box. It focuses on simplicity and lightweight implementation, making it a good choice for smaller projects or websites that do not need advanced functionality. MUI, on the other hand, offers a wider range of components and features, including more complex elements like data grids and tables. It caters to larger projects and applications that require more advanced functionality.

  2. Customization and Theming: MDL offers limited customization options, with predefined styles that can be easily applied to components. It follows a strict design language, making it ideal for maintaining consistency across different projects. MUI, on the other hand, provides extensive customization and theming capabilities. It allows developers to easily override styles, modify components, and create their own themes, providing more flexibility and control over the design.

  3. Installation and Setup: MDL can be quickly set up by including the necessary CSS and JavaScript files in the project. It does not require a build tool or package manager, making it easy to integrate with existing projects. MUI, on the other hand, requires a more involved setup process. It is typically installed using a package manager like npm or yarn and requires a build tool like webpack or Babel for transpiling and bundling the code.

  4. Community and Documentation: MDL has a large and active community of developers, with comprehensive documentation and a wide range of tutorials and resources available online. It has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem. MUI, although relatively newer, also has a growing community and a well-maintained documentation. It benefits from the popularity of React, the JavaScript library it is built upon, and has a strong developer community supporting it.

  5. Browser Compatibility: MDL is designed to work on a wide range of browsers, including older versions that may not support modern web standards. It provides graceful degradation, ensuring that the components still function correctly even on older browsers. MUI, being built on React, requires a modern browser that supports ES6 and other modern web technologies. It does not provide support for older browsers out of the box.

  6. Integration with JavaScript Frameworks: MDL can be easily integrated with different JavaScript frameworks, including React, Angular, and Vue. It provides guidance and examples for each of these frameworks. MUI, being built on React, is inherently designed for seamless integration with React projects. It provides a set of React components that can be easily used in a React application, but integrating it with other frameworks may require additional effort.

In summary, MDL is a lightweight and simple library with limited customization options, ideal for smaller projects, while MUI offers a wider range of components and extensive customization capabilities, making it suitable for larger and more complex applications. MDL is easy to set up and works on a wide range of browsers, including older ones, whereas MUI requires a more involved setup process and supports modern browsers only. Both libraries have active communities and comprehensive documentation available online.

Advice on Material Design Lite and Material-UI
Needs advice
on
Material-UIMaterial-UI
and
reactstrapreactstrap

My React website is a simple 5-pager that attaches to a database to store and display registrations and other data. The user (small user base) can change any form elements, but I don't need theme-ing, though that would be fun for the user. reactstrap/react-bootstrap built on Bootstrap 4 sounds dated. I am familiar with reactstrap, but a friend said to try Material-UI. The thought of learning it is interesting, but somehow I think it might be overkill. So... reactstrap, react-bootstrap, or Material UI, which should I use?

See more
Replies (8)

MaterialUI may be overkill for such a simple project, you're right. So I'm recommending both tools in this StackShare form.

But if it's planned to increase the project, consider migrating it to MUI in advance. Among its pros I can name: - brilliant TS support - all popular use cases covered - well documented - backed by sponsors == will live and be maintained

See more
Recommends
on
Material-UIMaterial-UI

I recommend Material-UI for a couple reasons. 1. It’s very easy to throw MUI into React. You can essentially just import the components you need in place of yours. Effectively, for a button, for example, you can swap out <button for MUI’s <Button and you can be done if that’s all you want. Looks great, no hassle, and they have simple guides to help you make good UI decisions on top of that. 2. It’s pretty up-to-date, and it has great docs. I use MUI all the time, and if I were doing a simple, small user-base app, I would definitely use it for the sake of convenience and speed of development.

See more
Robert Smith
Tech Delivery Manager at self · | 2 upvotes · 33.7K views
Recommends

I've used material UI and had great success with it on React projects. Semantic UI is also another great option https://semantic-ui.com/.

When you say its "overkill", I would think long term. I do a lot of small projects not only for the purpose of the project, but also for learning, future projects and to use professionaly. It's a long-term investment.

See more
Recommends
on
Material-UIMaterial-UI

Material-UI looks great and is easy to use. Highly recommended, my favourite UI framework for React.

See more
Recommends
on
Material-UIMaterial-UI

Much more modern in terms on support for css in js. But go for v5 not v4 as material-ui is going through a transition in term of its own implementation

See more
Flavio Ribeiro
REACT DEVELOPER at Beblue · | 1 upvotes · 33.6K views
Recommends
on
Material-UIMaterial-UI

Material-UI is the good choice for a small project. It's fast for development, maintenance, and is ready to use. It HaveMaterial-UI is the good choice for a small project. It's fast for development, maintenance, and is ready to use. Has an excellent documentation with pratic examples.

See more
Malik Bagwala
Front-end Developer at Vesatogo Innovations · | 1 upvotes · 33.8K views
Recommends
on
Chakra UIChakra UI

Chakra UI seems like the perfect fit in my opinion. It has a much powerful design system, all the necessary components and it is dead simple to learn. And pretty easy to customize too.

See more
Recommends

It's totally the design decision if you like to follow bootstrap design then you should go for reactstrap. But if you want to follow google material design then you should go for material ui.

See more
Decisions about Material Design Lite and Material-UI
Kexin Lin
at University of Toronto · | 8 upvotes · 273.6K views

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

See more
Xinyi Liu
Software Developer at BigClarity · | 6 upvotes · 348.7K views

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

See more

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Material Design Lite
Pros of Material-UI
  • 23
    Material Design straight from the original creators
  • 11
    Based on bem philosophy
  • 9
    Nice animations
  • 7
    SCSS
  • 5
    Simple Material Design
  • 5
    Doesn't depend on JavaScript
  • 2
    Custom color palette generates CDN
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
  • 15
    Looks great
  • 13
    Responsive
  • 12
    Good documentation
  • 9
    LESS
  • 8
    Ui component
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 6
    Code examples
  • 5
    JSS
  • 3
    Supports old browsers out of the box
  • 3
    Interface
  • 3
    Angular
  • 3
    Very accessible
  • 3
    Fun
  • 2
    Typescript support
  • 2
    # of components
  • 2
    Designed for Server Side Rendering
  • 1
    Support for multiple styling systems
  • 1
    Accessibility
  • 1
    Easy to work with
  • 1
    Css

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Material Design Lite
Cons of Material-UI
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 36
      Hard to learn. Bad documentation
    • 29
      Hard to customize
    • 22
      Hard to understand Docs
    • 9
      Bad performance
    • 7
      Extra library needed for date/time pickers
    • 7
      For editable table component need to use material-table
    • 2
      Typescript Support
    • 1
      # of components

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Material Design Lite?

    Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.

    What is Material-UI?

    Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Material Design Lite?
    What companies use Material-UI?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Material Design Lite?
    What tools integrate with Material-UI?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Material Design Lite and Material-UI?
      Bootstrap
      Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
      Material Design
      Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.
      Materialize
      A CSS Framework based on material design.
      Angular Material
      Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.
      Vuetify
      Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.
      See all alternatives