StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs SwiftWebUI

Material-UI vs SwiftWebUI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
SwiftWebUI
SwiftWebUI
Stacks5
Followers24
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.3K
Forks163

Material-UI vs SwiftWebUI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web and app development, Material-UI and SwiftWebUI are two popular frameworks that offer different approaches and features. Here, we will explore the key differences between Material-UI and SwiftWebUI.

  1. Styling and Theming: Material-UI provides a rich set of pre-built components with customizable styling options. It follows the Material Design guidelines and offers a wide range of design choices. On the other hand, SwiftWebUI allows developers to leverage the power of Swift programming language to create highly customizable UI components and styles. It gives more flexibility in terms of styling and theming options.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Material-UI is primarily focused on web development and provides responsive design capabilities for different screen sizes. It works well across various modern web browsers. In contrast, SwiftWebUI is designed specifically for developing user interfaces for Apple platforms, such as iOS, macOS, and watchOS. It leverages the SwiftUI framework, which is tightly integrated with the Apple ecosystem.

  3. Development Paradigm: Material-UI follows a declarative approach, where the UI is defined as a function of the application state. It uses React, a JavaScript library, for building user interfaces. SwiftWebUI, on the other hand, uses a similar declarative approach but with the power of Swift programming language. It allows developers to build complex UI structures using Swift's strong typing and advanced features.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Material-UI has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. It has a wide range of third-party libraries and plugins available, making it easy to extend its functionality. SwiftWebUI, being relatively new, has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Material-UI. However, it benefits from the existing Swift and SwiftUI community, which is growing rapidly.

  5. Integration with Existing Codebase: Material-UI can be easily integrated into existing JavaScript projects, making it a popular choice for frontend web development. It has a smooth integration with popular JavaScript frameworks like React and Angular. SwiftWebUI, on the other hand, is more suitable for new projects or projects already built using Swift. It can seamlessly integrate with SwiftUI-based iOS/macOS projects, providing a consistent user experience.

  6. Performance and Optimization: Material-UI is optimized for web performance and provides techniques like lazy loading, code splitting, and caching for faster loading and rendering of web applications. It has been tested and optimized across different web browsers. SwiftWebUI, being based on SwiftUI, benefits from the performance optimizations provided by Apple's frameworks. It leverages hardware acceleration and SwiftUI's rendering engine to ensure smooth and efficient UI rendering.

In summary, Material-UI is a widely adopted framework for web development, offering a rich set of pre-built components and themes, while SwiftWebUI is a Swift-based framework primarily focused on Apple platforms, providing flexibility and integration with SwiftUI.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, SwiftWebUI

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
SwiftWebUI
SwiftWebUI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It allows you to write SwiftUI Views which display in a web browser. It doesn’t just render SwiftUI Views as HTML. It also sets up a connection between the browser and the code hosted in the Swift server, allowing for interaction - buttons, pickers, steppers, lists, navigation, you get it all.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Learn once, use anywhere
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
163
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
5
Followers
3.7K
Followers
24
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
Swift
Swift
SwiftUI
SwiftUI

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, SwiftWebUI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase