Overview

RocketChat

Stacks372

Followers542

Votes324

GitHub Stars43.8K

Forks12.4K

Mattermost

Stacks488

Followers582

Votes302

Mattermost vs RocketChat: What are the differences?

Introduction: In today's digital era, team collaboration is crucial for the success of any organization. Similarly, communication platforms play a vital role in facilitating effective collaboration within teams. Mattermost and RocketChat are two popular communication platforms that offer features like team messaging, file sharing, and video conferencing. However, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: Mattermost is built on a hybrid architecture, combining server-side code with client-side JavaScript. On the other hand, RocketChat relies on the Meteor framework, which is a full-stack JavaScript platform. This architectural difference can impact performance and scalability, with Mattermost offering better control over server resources and RocketChat enabling rapid development.
Self-hosted vs. Cloud: Mattermost provides both self-hosted and cloud-hosted options, giving organizations the flexibility to choose where they want to deploy their communication infrastructure. In contrast, RocketChat primarily focuses on the self-hosted model, where organizations have full control over their data and security. This difference allows organizations to tailor their communication setup according to their specific needs.
Customization and Extensibility: Both Mattermost and RocketChat offer various customization and extensibility options. However, Mattermost provides more flexibility in terms of theming, branding, and plugins. Mattermost allows deep integrations with other applications through its RESTful API, providing extensive customization possibilities. RocketChat also supports customization but may require more technical expertise to achieve the desired level of flexibility.
Enterprise-Grade Features: Mattermost is known for its enterprise-grade features, focusing on security, compliance, and administration capabilities. It offers features like advanced access controls, compliance exports, and extensive user management options. RocketChat also provides security features but may not have the same level of enterprise-grade capabilities as Mattermost.
Community and Support: Both Mattermost and RocketChat have active communities contributing to their development. However, Mattermost has a larger community and a significant number of enterprise users, which results in a more extensive support ecosystem. Mattermost offers commercial support options, including 24/7 support, whereas RocketChat relies more on its community support.
User Interface and User Experience: Mattermost and RocketChat have different approaches to user interface design. Mattermost focuses on a clean and enterprise-oriented look, emphasizing productivity and ease of use. RocketChat, on the other hand, aims for a more modern and feature-rich interface, focusing on providing a visually appealing user experience. This difference in design philosophy can influence user preference based on individual needs.

In summary, Mattermost and RocketChat differ in terms of their architectural approach, deployment options, customization and extensibility, enterprise-grade features, community and support, as well as user interface and user experience. Organizations should carefully evaluate these differences to choose the platform that best aligns with their collaboration requirements and preferences.

Advice on RocketChat, Mattermost

Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k

Comments

Christopher

CEO at TheBig3

Feb 8, 2021

Decided

Mattermost sports higher performance, uses Postgres, is a pure server side application not using up too much of system resources on the client side, and gives an overall enterprise grade impression in general.

Updates go smooth without a hassle, everything is organised logically, and the integration with the OS is absolutely stable. Apart from that, the underlying runtimes and code are mature, proven and stable.

The developers are maybe a bit more cautious in regard to introducing new features, but they maintain a stable experience, not breaking the codebase in order to hastily implement bells and whistles, which are not yet ready for production. Documentation and debugging are fantastic, so running this in enterprise production environment is absolutely approved of.

48.2k views48.2k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RocketChat	Mattermost
Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.	Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.
BYOS (bring your own server);Multiple Rooms;Direct Messages;Private Groups;Public Channels;Desktop Notifications;Mentions;Avatars;Markdown;Emojis;Transcripts / History;I18n - Internationalization	All your team communication in one place, searchable and accessible anywhere; Slack-compatible, not Slack-limited. Imports Slack channels, users and themes. Offers Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations including Hubot, Jenkins, GitLab and others; Self-host ready with System Console and IT admin tools for managing dozens of team sites. Installs with Linux binary, plus Docker, Heroku, AWS, Azure and Cloud Foundry options
Statistics
GitHub Stars 43.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 12.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 372	Stacks 488
Followers 542	Followers 582
Votes 324	Votes 302
Pros & Cons
Pros 72 Open source 38 Can be deployed on premise 32 Byos (bring your own server) 30 Faster than Slack 21 Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch Cons 1 Not as well-known as others like it 1 Hard to upgrade 1 Poor user customization 1 Limited message history on SaaS 1 Few options for user customization	Pros 60 Open source 41 On-premise deployment 26 Free 22 Built using golang 21 Fast and easy to use Cons 2 Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise 2 Less integrations and plugins than slack 2 Many basic features are enterprise only 1 Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB 1 Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
Integrations
Confluence GitHub Amazon S3 GitLab Prometheus Jira Amazon SNS GitHub Enterprise Hubot Docker Cloud	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2 Segment Jenkins GitLab Microsoft Azure Google Compute Engine Hubot Cloud Foundry Amazon SES

What are some alternatives to RocketChat, Mattermost?

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.