StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Metricbeat vs Ruby Server Timing

Metricbeat vs Ruby Server Timing

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Metricbeat
Metricbeat
Stacks48
Followers125
Votes3
Ruby Server Timing
Ruby Server Timing
Stacks0
Followers4
Votes0
GitHub Stars514
Forks6

Metricbeat vs Ruby Server Timing: What are the differences?

Metricbeat vs Ruby Server Timing

Introduction: This Markdown code compares the key differences between Metricbeat and Ruby Server Timing.

1. **Data Collection**: Metricbeat is used for collecting various system and application performance metrics, while Ruby Server Timing is specifically focused on tracking timing information within Ruby applications.
   
2. **Supported Technologies**: Metricbeat supports monitoring a wide range of technologies and platforms, including databases, web servers, and cloud services. In contrast, Ruby Server Timing is designed specifically for Ruby applications and may not be as versatile in terms of technology support.
   
3. **Ease of Use**: Metricbeat provides a user-friendly interface for configuring and managing metric collection, making it easier for users to set up monitoring for different systems. Ruby Server Timing may require more manual configuration within the Ruby application code, which can be more complex for some users.
   
4. **Data Visualization**: Metricbeat data can be visualized through tools like Kibana, allowing for easy monitoring and analysis of performance metrics. Ruby Server Timing data may need to be processed and visualized separately, as it may not have built-in integration with popular visualization tools.
   
5. **Community Support**: Metricbeat is part of the Elastic Stack and has a large community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation and support resources. Ruby Server Timing may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and assistance.
   
6. **Customization**: Metricbeat offers extensive customization options for defining specific metrics to collect and monitor, allowing users to tailor monitoring to their specific needs. Ruby Server Timing may have more limited customization capabilities, focusing primarily on timing metrics within Ruby applications.

In Summary, Metricbeat and Ruby Server Timing differ in data collection, supported technologies, ease of use, data visualization, community support, and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Metricbeat, Ruby Server Timing

Sunil
Sunil

Team Lead at XYZ

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceonPrometheusPrometheusGrafanaGrafanaLinuxLinux

Hi, We have a situation, where we are using Prometheus to get system metrics from PCF (Pivotal Cloud Foundry) platform. We send that as time-series data to Cortex via a Prometheus server and built a dashboard using Grafana. There is another pipeline where we need to read metrics from a Linux server using Metricbeat, CPU, memory, and Disk. That will be sent to Elasticsearch and Grafana will pull and show the data in a dashboard.

Is it OK to use Metricbeat for Linux server or can we use Prometheus?

What is the difference in system metrics sent by Metricbeat and Prometheus node exporters?

Regards, Sunil.

595k views595k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Metricbeat
Metricbeat
Ruby Server Timing
Ruby Server Timing

Collect metrics from your systems and services. From CPU to memory, Redis to NGINX, and much more, It is a lightweight way to send system and service statistics.

Bring Ruby on Rails server-side performance metrics 📈 to Chrome's Developer Tools (and other browsers that support the Server Timing API) via the server_timing gem. Metrics are collected from the scout_apm gem. A Scout account is not required.

System-Level Monitoring; system-level CPU usage statistics; Network IO statistics
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
514
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6
Stacks
48
Stacks
0
Followers
125
Followers
4
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Simple
  • 1
    Easy to setup
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Redis
Redis
Linux
Linux
NGINX
NGINX
Windows
Windows
Rails
Rails
Docker
Docker
Ruby
Ruby
Heroku
Heroku
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry

What are some alternatives to Metricbeat, Ruby Server Timing?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana