StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Design Tools
  4. Visual Collaboration
  5. Miro vs Tandem HQ

Miro vs Tandem HQ

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Miro
Miro
Stacks1.1K
Followers580
Votes6
Tandem HQ
Tandem HQ
Stacks11
Followers24
Votes0

Miro vs Tandem HQ: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Miro and Tandem HQ, it's essential to highlight the key differences between these two collaboration tools.

  1. Features and Functionality: Miro primarily focuses on visual collaboration, offering extensive tools for creating diagrams, mind maps, and other visual representations. On the other hand, Tandem HQ is more tailored towards synchronous remote teamwork, emphasizing features like video calling, screen sharing, and a virtual office setup.

  2. User Interface: Miro has a sleek, intuitive interface with a focus on design elements for visual collaboration. In contrast, Tandem HQ provides a clean and minimalistic interface that prioritizes functionality, making it easy for users to navigate and access essential features quickly.

  3. Integration with Other Tools: Miro offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Microsoft Teams, allowing users to seamlessly incorporate visual collaboration into their existing workflows. Tandem HQ also provides integrations with tools like Slack, Zoom, and Google Calendar, but with a stronger emphasis on real-time communication and collaboration.

  4. Customization Options: Miro provides a high level of customization, allowing users to easily tailor boards, templates, and elements to suit their specific needs and preferences. In comparison, Tandem HQ offers fewer customization options but focuses more on providing a unified platform for remote team communication and collaboration.

  5. Collaboration Modes: Miro supports asynchronous collaboration, enabling users to work on projects at their own pace and time. Tandem HQ, on the other hand, emphasizes synchronous collaboration, fostering real-time communication and teamwork, making it ideal for remote teams that require instant feedback and interaction.

  6. Pricing Plans: Miro offers a range of pricing plans with different features and capabilities to cater to the needs of various users, including individual professionals, small teams, and enterprises. In contrast, Tandem HQ offers a single pricing plan with all features included, simplifying the decision-making process for organizations looking for a comprehensive remote collaboration solution.

In Summary, Miro and Tandem HQ differ in their focus on visual collaboration versus synchronous remote teamwork, user interface design, integration options, customization features, collaboration modes, and pricing plans.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Miro
Miro
Tandem HQ
Tandem HQ

It is a visual collaboration platform to create, collaborate, and centralize communication across your company on a single online whiteboard.

It is a virtual office for remote teams. You can see which work apps your team is working in, and join them with a click. You can see who is in work mode and get quick feedback on your work.

centralized hub for strategy and planning and ship more, faster; Ideate, organize insights, design flows, and collect feedback in real time; Keep everyone aligned, increase team throughput, and deliver better results
Cross-platform; Group Conversations; 40+ Integrations; Hang out in a minimal voice/video call to feel connected
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
11
Followers
580
Followers
24
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Vector Canvas and Export
  • 1
    Very active community
  • 1
    Suitable for interactive presentations
  • 0
    Best visual collaboration tool for remote workshops
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
Confluence
Confluence
Intercom
Intercom
Confluence
Confluence
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira
Zoom
Zoom
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Zendesk
Zendesk
Adobe Illustrator
Adobe Illustrator
Eclipse
Eclipse
SourceTree
SourceTree

What are some alternatives to Miro, Tandem HQ?

Ziflow

Ziflow

Created by the founders of ProofHQ, Ziflow's enterprise online proofing software helps brands and agencies deliver marketing projects faster by streamlining the review and approval of creative content, improving collaboration, centralizing feedback and eliminating manual steps through automated workflow. It replaces email, printouts and other ad-hoc methods for reviewing creative content with an enterprise-ready, pure-play online proofing solution.

Conceptboard

Conceptboard

Share and discuss your ideas, documents and concepts visually in one place rather than exchanging endless e-mail attachments.

Quire

Quire

It is a modern task management app for creative teams. It lets you map out your big ideas, break them down into small steps, and tackle them one by one with your team.

Croquet

Croquet

It is a platform that makes it easy to create high performance, Live Collaboration applications. Build interactive multiplayer experiences into your web apps and games.

Material Sourcing Software for Designers

Material Sourcing Software for Designers

Material sourcing and specification software for interior designers and architects. Design material boards, create spec sheets and client presentations in one platform.

Omega First Software

Omega First Software

WunderView is a high-performance 3D CAD viewer designed for engineers and technical professionals. It enables ultra-fast loading and smooth inspection of large and complex CAD models without the complexity of full CAD systems. Ideal for viewing, reviewing, and collaboration.

Multic — The GenAI Game Engine for Artists

Multic — The GenAI Game Engine for Artists

The multiplayer comic platform where creators and AI collaborate. Build interactive narratives with node-graph storytelling, real-time collaboration, and infinite possibilities.

Lucidly.so

Lucidly.so

Lucidly is a proofing tool that makes it easy to comment, review, and collaborate on any website. Streamline your feedback with fast navigation and organized Kanban views.

Wireflow

Wireflow

Wireflow is a powerful AI tool designed to streamline wireframing and prototyping processes for digital product designers. With its intuitive interface, Wireflow enables users to create, visualize, and iterate on their design ideas quickly and efficiently. This tool supports collaborative workflows, allowing teams to work together seamlessly, enhancing productivity and creativity. Ideal for UX/UI designers, Wireflow simplifies the design process, making it easier to bring concepts to life while ensuring clarity and precision. Elevate your design projects and improve team collaboration with Wireflow's advanced features and user-friendly environment.

Huddlekit

Huddlekit

Collect visual feedback on websites and creative assets in one place. Annotate, inspect, and review website breakpoints side‑by‑side so your team can spot issues quickly and launch faster.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack