StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. MQTT vs SignalR

MQTT vs SignalR

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MQTT
MQTT
Stacks635
Followers577
Votes7
SignalR
SignalR
Stacks656
Followers1.2K
Votes146
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks2.3K

MQTT vs SignalR: What are the differences?

Key Differences between MQTT and SignalR

MQTT and SignalR are two popular communication protocols used in web development. While both offer real-time communication capabilities, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Message Handling: MQTT is a lightweight publish-subscribe messaging protocol that uses a broker to handle message delivery. Clients subscribe to specific topics and receive messages when published. SignalR, on the other hand, provides a real-time bi-directional communication framework using WebSocket, allowing for instant communication between the server and clients.

  2. Protocol Support: MQTT supports multiple protocols, including TCP/IP, WebSockets, and other custom protocols. This flexibility enables MQTT to be used in various scenarios and devices. On the other hand, SignalR primarily relies on WebSocket for communication, offering better performance and efficiency but limiting its compatibility to platforms that support WebSocket.

  3. Broadcasting vs Point-to-Point: MQTT is designed for broadcasting messages to multiple subscribers. When a message is published to a topic, all subscribed clients receive it. SignalR, however, enables both broadcasting and point-to-point communication. It allows for direct communication between specific clients or groups of clients.

  4. QoS and Reliability: MQTT provides various levels of Quality of Service (QoS) to ensure message delivery reliability, including At Most Once, At Least Once, and Exactly Once. SignalR, on the other hand, focuses more on real-time capabilities and does not offer the same level of QoS guarantees. It provides a best-effort delivery model that prioritizes low latency and high responsiveness.

  5. Transport Mechanism: MQTT can work over different network protocols, such as TCP/IP and WebSockets, making it adaptable to different network conditions and device capabilities. SignalR, on the other hand, relies heavily on WebSocket for communication, providing a more efficient and low-latency transport mechanism suitable for modern web applications.

  6. Use Case and Scalability: MQTT is widely used in IoT (Internet of Things) and machine-to-machine communication scenarios, where lightweight communication and scalability are crucial. It is designed to handle large-scale deployments with minimal resource consumption. On the contrary, SignalR is commonly used in web applications that require real-time updates, such as chat applications, collaborative editing, and live dashboards. It offers a more feature-rich framework for building interactive web applications.

In summary, MQTT is a lightweight protocol with robust message handling and scalability features, primarily used in IoT scenarios. SignalR, on the other hand, provides a real-time bi-directional communication framework that focuses on performance and efficiency, suitable for web applications requiring real-time updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MQTT
MQTT
SignalR
SignalR

It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
635
Stacks
656
Followers
577
Followers
1.2K
Votes
7
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Varying levels of Quality of Service to fit a range of
  • 2
    Very easy to configure and use with open source tools
  • 2
    Lightweight with a relatively small data footprint
Cons
  • 1
    Easy to configure in an unsecure manner
Pros
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to MQTT, SignalR?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase