StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Spring

Next.js vs Spring

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring
Spring
Stacks3.9K
Followers4.8K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Next.js and Spring, two popular frameworks for web development. Next.js is a framework for building server-rendered React applications, while Spring is a framework for building enterprise Java applications.

  1. Architecture and Language: Next.js is built on top of React and uses JavaScript or TypeScript for development. It follows a client-side rendering approach, where pages are rendered on the client side using JavaScript. Spring, on the other hand, is built on top of Java and follows a server-side rendering approach, where pages are rendered on the server and HTML is sent to the clients.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Next.js is well-suited for building single-page applications (SPAs) and provides features like code splitting and pre-rendering, which help improve performance and load times. It also has built-in support for server-side rendering and static site generation. Spring, being a Java framework, is designed for building large-scale enterprise applications. It provides features like dependency injection, transaction management, and support for various databases, which are crucial for building complex enterprise systems.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js has a vibrant and growing community of developers and a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks. It is widely used for building front-end applications and has a large number of open-source projects and resources available. Spring, being a Java-based framework, also has a strong community and a mature ecosystem. It is widely adopted in the enterprise world and has extensive documentation, resources, and community support.

  4. Flexibility and Extensibility: Next.js provides a flexible and extensible development experience. It allows developers to use their own configuration and setup for routing, state management, and component libraries. It also has support for serverless functions and can be easily integrated with other JavaScript frameworks and libraries. Spring, being a Java framework, offers a high degree of flexibility and extensibility. It provides various modules and libraries for different functionalities like web development, security, data access, and more.

  5. Learning Curve: Next.js has a relatively low learning curve for developers familiar with React and JavaScript. It provides a simple and intuitive way of building UI components and handling state management. Spring, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its Java-based architecture and extensive feature set. It requires knowledge of Java and understanding of Java-based technologies like Servlets, JDBC, and JPA.

  6. Platform Independence: Next.js is a front-end framework that runs on the browser and is platform-independent. It can be used with any back-end technology or server. Spring, being a full-stack Java framework, is platform-independent as well. It can run on any operating system that supports the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and can be deployed on various application servers like Tomcat, Jetty, or JBoss.

In summary, Next.js is a front-end framework built on React, offering scalability, performance, and flexibility for building client-side rendered applications. Spring, on the other hand, is a Java-based enterprise framework known for its scalability, extensive feature set, and community support. The choice between Next.js and Spring depends on the specific requirements of the project and the skillset of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring, Next.js

Tushar
Tushar

Jan 7, 2021

Needs adviceonSpringSpringSpring BootSpring BootDjangoDjango

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

827k views827k
Comments
Yucen
Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k
Comments
Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring
Spring
Next.js
Next.js

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

-
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
3.9K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
4.8K
Followers
5.1K
Votes
1.1K
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 230
    Java
  • 157
    Open source
  • 136
    Great community
  • 123
    Very powerful
  • 114
    Enterprise
Cons
  • 15
    Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat
  • 4
    Poor documentation
  • 3
    Java
  • 3
    Verbose configuration
  • 2
    Java is more verbose language in compare to python
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Java
Java
React
React

What are some alternatives to Spring, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase