Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Envoy vs nginx: What are the differences?
Envoy and Nginx are both open-source, high-performance web servers, but they cater to different needs. Envoy is a service mesh proxy designed for microservices architectures, offering advanced features like load balancing, circuit breaking, and health checks. Nginx excels at static content delivery and traditional web serving, known for its stability and ease of use. Here are the key differences between the two.
- Architecture: Envoy and nginx have different architectures. Envoy is designed as a service proxy and follows a sidecar architecture, where it runs alongside each service application instance. On the other hand, nginx is a reverse proxy server that typically runs on a separate server and handles incoming client requests. This architectural difference allows Envoy to provide more advanced features like service discovery, load balancing, and circuit-breaking.
- API Abstraction: Envoy and nginx have different levels of API abstraction. Envoy is designed to provide a more granular control over the underlying network communication, providing a rich set of configuration options through its API. In contrast, nginx provides a more abstract and simplified API, which makes it easier to configure for basic use cases but may limit the flexibility for more complex deployments.
- Extensibility: Envoy and nginx offer different levels of extensibility. Envoy has a modular architecture that allows users to plug in custom filters and extensions at various network layers, enabling the implementation of custom logic and integration with different systems. Nginx also supports some level of extensibility through modules, but the options are more limited compared to Envoy.
- Protocol Support: Envoy and nginx have different levels of protocol support. Envoy is built to handle modern protocols like gRPC and HTTP/2 out of the box, along with HTTP/1.1 and TCP. Nginx also supports these protocols but may require additional configuration or modules to handle newer protocols like gRPC effectively.
- Observability and Debugging: Envoy and nginx provide different observability and debugging capabilities. Envoy has built-in support for distributed tracing, request-level logs, and metrics, making it easier to monitor and analyze the behavior of your services. Nginx also provides logging and metrics capabilities but may require additional setup or third-party tools for tracing and advanced monitoring.
- Community and Ecosystem: Envoy and nginx have different community sizes and ecosystems. Envoy has gained significant traction in the cloud-native community and has a large and active community supporting its development and maintenance. Nginx has been around for a longer time and also has a strong community, but its ecosystem is more focused on traditional web server use cases.
In summary, Envoy, a service mesh proxy, shines in the dynamic world of microservices, offering advanced functionalities like load balancing and health checks. Nginx, on the other hand, reigns supreme in the realm of static content delivery, known for its stability and ease of use.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
Pros of Envoy
- GRPC-Web9
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance894
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Envoy
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10