StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. nginx vs ngrok

nginx vs ngrok

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
ngrok
ngrok
Stacks419
Followers457
Votes57
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks4.3K

nginx vs ngrok: What are the differences?

nginx is a web server software that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, and HTTP cache. On the other hand, ngrok is a tunneling service that allows you to expose your local server to the internet. While both have their own strengths and use cases, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Installation and Configuration: nginx requires installation on a server or a computer where it will run, and then it needs to be configured through configuration files. On the other hand, ngrok is a command-line tool that can be easily downloaded and run without any installation or configuration required.

  2. Functionality: nginx is primarily designed to be a web server software that handles HTTP requests and serves web pages. It can also be configured as a reverse proxy or a load balancer to distribute incoming requests to multiple servers. On the other hand, ngrok is specifically designed to expose local servers to the internet by creating secure tunnels. It allows developers to test their webhooks, APIs, or any locally running server.

  3. Security: When it comes to security, nginx provides various security features like SSL/TLS support, built-in DDoS protection, and access control capabilities. It is widely used in production environments and can be hardened to defend against various attacks. On the other hand, ngrok, being a tunneling service, creates a secure tunnel between your local server and the internet. It uses random URLs and secure connections to ensure the privacy and security of your local server.

  4. Scalability:nginx is known for its high-performance and scalability. It can handle thousands of concurrent connections and efficiently serve static content. It also offers load balancing capabilities to distribute traffic across multiple servers, thereby enhancing scalability. On the other hand, ngrok is more focused on facilitating tunneling and exposing local servers, rather than scaling to handle high traffic loads.

  5. Deployment:nginx is typically deployed on a server or a cloud infrastructure where it intercepts and handles incoming HTTP requests. It requires proper server setup, configuration, and maintenance. On the other hand, ngrok is a lightweight tool that can be easily run from the command line, making it suitable for local development and testing environments. It doesn't require complex deployment procedures.

  6. Licensing and Cost:nginx is an open-source software released under the 2-clause BSD license. This means it is free to use and modify, making it attractive for both personal and commercial projects. On the other hand, ngrok offers both free and paid plans. The free plan provides basic features and limited usage, while the paid plans offer additional features and increased usage limits.

In summary, nginx is a powerful web server software with versatile functionality and high-performance capabilities, while ngrok is a tunneling service designed to expose local servers to the internet.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, ngrok

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
ngrok
ngrok

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

-
Expose any http service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a subdomain of ngrok.com;Expose any tcp service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a random port of ngrok.com;Inspect all http requests/responses that are transmitted over the tunnel;Replay any request that was transmitted over the tunnel
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
419
Followers
61.9K
Followers
457
Votes
5.5K
Votes
57
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 26
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Super-fast
  • 7
    Free
  • 6
    Awesome traffic analysis page
  • 5
    Reliable custom domains
Cons
  • 5
    Doesn't Support UDP
  • 1
    El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente
Integrations
No integrations available
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to NGINX, ngrok?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot