Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

NGINX

113.3K
60.9K
+ 1
5.5K
Sanic

95
133
+ 1
10
Add tool

Sanic vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here is a comparison between Sanic and Nginx, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Request Handling: Sanic is an asynchronous Python web framework that is designed to handle multiple requests concurrently in a non-blocking way, utilizing Python's asyncio library. On the other hand, Nginx is a high-performance web server and reverse proxy server that can handle a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently using an event-driven architecture.

  2. Server-Side Scripting: Sanic provides a server-side scripting environment for Python web applications, allowing developers to build and deploy web services easily. Nginx, on the other hand, is primarily used as a server and proxy for static content, and it doesn't provide server-side scripting capabilities out of the box.

  3. Flexibility: Sanic allows developers to write web applications using Python, giving them the flexibility to leverage Python's extensive libraries and ecosystem. In contrast, Nginx is a standalone web server with a predefined set of functionalities and configurations, limiting its flexibility when it comes to customizing application behavior.

  4. Scalability: Sanic is designed to handle high levels of concurrency and can scale efficiently to handle a large number of concurrent requests. It leverages asynchronous programming techniques to achieve high-performance throughput. On the other hand, Nginx is known for its ability to handle high levels of concurrent connections and efficiently distribute incoming requests to multiple backend servers.

  5. Load Balancing: Nginx provides built-in load balancing capabilities, allowing it to distribute incoming requests to multiple backend servers based on various algorithms like round-robin, least connections, IP hash, etc. Sanic, on the other hand, doesn't have built-in load balancing capabilities and would require additional components or configurations to achieve load balancing.

  6. Configuration: Nginx has a comprehensive and flexible configuration language that allows developers to customize various aspects of server behavior, such as request handling, caching, SSL/TLS termination, etc. Sanic also provides configuration options, but they are primarily focused on application-specific settings and not as extensive as Nginx's configuration capabilities.

In summary, Sanic is an asynchronous Python web framework that provides server-side scripting capabilities and leverages Python's asyncio library for efficient request handling. Nginx, on the other hand, is a high-performance web server and reverse proxy server with advanced load balancing and extensive configuration options.

Advice on NGINX and Sanic

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 718K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 684K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Decisions about NGINX and Sanic
Grant Steuart
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of NGINX
Pros of Sanic
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 894
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 289
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 226
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
  • 5
    Asyncio
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Easy to use server
  • 1
    Websockets

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of NGINX
Cons of Sanic
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is NGINX?

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

    What is Sanic?

    Sanic is a Flask-like Python 3.5+ web server that's written to go fast. It's based on the work done by the amazing folks at magicstack. On top of being Flask-like, Sanic supports async request handlers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention NGINX and Sanic as a desired skillset
    What companies use NGINX?
    What companies use Sanic?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with NGINX?
    What tools integrate with Sanic?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to NGINX and Sanic?
    HAProxy
    HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
    lighttpd
    lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.
    Traefik
    A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
    Caddy
    Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.
    Envoy
    Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
    See all alternatives