Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sanic vs nginx: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Here is a comparison between Sanic and Nginx, highlighting their key differences.
Request Handling: Sanic is an asynchronous Python web framework that is designed to handle multiple requests concurrently in a non-blocking way, utilizing Python's asyncio library. On the other hand, Nginx is a high-performance web server and reverse proxy server that can handle a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently using an event-driven architecture.
Server-Side Scripting: Sanic provides a server-side scripting environment for Python web applications, allowing developers to build and deploy web services easily. Nginx, on the other hand, is primarily used as a server and proxy for static content, and it doesn't provide server-side scripting capabilities out of the box.
Flexibility: Sanic allows developers to write web applications using Python, giving them the flexibility to leverage Python's extensive libraries and ecosystem. In contrast, Nginx is a standalone web server with a predefined set of functionalities and configurations, limiting its flexibility when it comes to customizing application behavior.
Scalability: Sanic is designed to handle high levels of concurrency and can scale efficiently to handle a large number of concurrent requests. It leverages asynchronous programming techniques to achieve high-performance throughput. On the other hand, Nginx is known for its ability to handle high levels of concurrent connections and efficiently distribute incoming requests to multiple backend servers.
Load Balancing: Nginx provides built-in load balancing capabilities, allowing it to distribute incoming requests to multiple backend servers based on various algorithms like round-robin, least connections, IP hash, etc. Sanic, on the other hand, doesn't have built-in load balancing capabilities and would require additional components or configurations to achieve load balancing.
Configuration: Nginx has a comprehensive and flexible configuration language that allows developers to customize various aspects of server behavior, such as request handling, caching, SSL/TLS termination, etc. Sanic also provides configuration options, but they are primarily focused on application-specific settings and not as extensive as Nginx's configuration capabilities.
In summary, Sanic is an asynchronous Python web framework that provides server-side scripting capabilities and leverages Python's asyncio library for efficient request handling. Nginx, on the other hand, is a high-performance web server and reverse proxy server with advanced load balancing and extensive configuration options.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
- Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
- The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
- The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
- PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance894
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Pros of Sanic
- Asyncio5
- Fast2
- Easy to use server2
- Websockets1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10