StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Webpack vs node-sass

Webpack vs node-sass

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
node-sass
node-sass
Stacks87
Followers145
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.5K
Forks1.3K

Webpack vs node-sass: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Webpack and node-sass. Webpack is a popular module bundler for JavaScript applications, while node-sass is a library that allows you to compile Sass into CSS using Node.js.

  1. Output:

    • Webpack: Webpack bundles all the necessary files, including JavaScript, CSS, and assets, into a single output file or multiple output files.
    • node-sass: node-sass, on the other hand, does not bundle files like Webpack. It is specifically designed to compile Sass files into CSS.
  2. Dependencies:

    • Webpack: Webpack allows you to manage and load various dependencies, such as JavaScript modules, CSS files, and assets, using loaders or plugins.
    • node-sass: node-sass, being a Sass compiler, does not manage or load JavaScript modules. Its main focus is on compiling Sass to CSS.
  3. Configuration:

    • Webpack: Webpack requires a complex configuration file (webpack.config.js) to define the entry point, output path, loaders, plugins, and other options.
    • node-sass: node-sass, on the other hand, does not require a configuration file like Webpack. It can be directly used as a command line tool or integrated into your Node.js scripts.
  4. Development vs Production:

    • Webpack: Webpack provides various features, such as hot module replacement, code splitting, and optimization, that are useful during development and deployment of applications.
    • node-sass: node-sass, being a Sass compiler, does not offer such development-specific features. It is primarily used for compiling Sass files in a production environment.
  5. Customization:

    • Webpack: Webpack allows you to customize the build process by configuring loaders, plugins, and other options to meet your specific project requirements.
    • node-sass: node-sass provides limited customization options compared to Webpack. Its main purpose is to compile Sass files into CSS, rather than providing a comprehensive build process.
  6. Integration:

    • Webpack: Webpack can be easily integrated with other build tools, task runners, and frameworks, such as Babel, ESLint, Jest, and React, to create a powerful development environment.
    • node-sass: node-sass can also be integrated with other tools and frameworks, but its main focus is on compiling Sass, making it a good fit for projects that heavily use Sass.

In summary, Webpack is a module bundler that can handle various types of assets, while node-sass is a library specifically designed to compile Sass files into CSS. Webpack offers more features and flexibility for building JavaScript applications, while node-sass is a lightweight tool for Sass compilation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, node-sass

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
node-sass
node-sass

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

It is a library that provides binding for Node.js to LibSass, the C version of the popular stylesheet preprocessor, Sass. It allows you to natively compile .scss files to css at incredible speed and automatically via a connect middleware.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Natively compile .scss files to css ; Binding for Node.js to LibSass
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
8.5K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
87
Followers
28.1K
Followers
145
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
Cons
  • 1
    Needs Microsoft BuildTools and Python 2.7 to install
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Sass
Sass

What are some alternatives to Webpack, node-sass?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Stylus

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

PostCSS

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Bourbon

Bourbon

Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot