Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Backpack
Backpack

9
18
+ 1
9
Webpack
Webpack

10.7K
7K
+ 1
741
Add tool

Backpack vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Backpack: Build Node.js backends with Webpack. Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to; Webpack: A bundler for javascript and friends. A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Backpack and Webpack belong to "JS Build Tools / JS Task Runners" category of the tech stack.

"Great docs" is the top reason why over 2 developers like Backpack, while over 307 developers mention "Most powerful bundler" as the leading cause for choosing Webpack.

Backpack and Webpack are both open source tools. Webpack with 49.5K GitHub stars and 6.22K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Backpack with 4.12K GitHub stars and 171 GitHub forks.

What is Backpack?

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

What is Webpack?

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Backpack?
Why do developers choose Webpack?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using Backpack?
What are the cons of using Webpack?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Backpack?
    What companies use Webpack?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Backpack?
    What tools integrate with Webpack?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Backpack and Webpack?
    gulp
    Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.
    Grunt
    The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
    Parcel
    Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.
    Brunch
    Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.
    rollup
    It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Backpack and Webpack
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Backpack and Webpack
    No reviews found
    How developers use Backpack and Webpack
    Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
    Volkan Özçelik uses WebpackWebpack

    Webpack is the best bundler. Period.

    Yes, it has a(n arguably) messy documentation, and a steep learning curve; but once you get the hang of it, there is nothing you cannot do with it.

    Use it and you don’t have to use any other bundler at all.

    It has a vivid ecosystem, and great plugin support.

    Avatar of Alec Cunningham
    Alec Cunningham uses WebpackWebpack

    My preferred build tool; allows me to bundle my JSX, JS, CSS files for easy access and I can pass the bundle through my node server for server side rendering.

    Avatar of Kent Steiner
    Kent Steiner uses WebpackWebpack

    Flexible building and compiling of source for browser consumption, mainly for JS, but experimenting a little with CSS (although I prefer StylusJS for CSS).

    Avatar of Andrew Gatenby
    Andrew Gatenby uses WebpackWebpack

    We use this to optimise the delivery of the client-side for our revised Admin System, so it's able to be delivered to browsers as efficiently as possible.

    Avatar of Cameron Drake
    Cameron Drake uses WebpackWebpack

    Webpack compiles files to bundles with source maps. Using Webpack you can use the latest features (ES6) and have it compiled to compliant js.

    How much does Backpack cost?
    How much does Webpack cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Backpack
    More news