Octopus Deploy vs Puppet Labs

Overview

Puppet Labs

Stacks1.3K

Followers793

Votes227

GitHub Stars7.7K

Forks2.2K

Octopus Deploy

Stacks407

Followers493

Votes118

Octopus Deploy vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Introducing the key differences between Octopus Deploy and Puppet Labs:

Deployment Approach: Octopus Deploy focuses on simplifying deployment processes by providing a user-friendly interface for managing releases and automating deployments across different environments. On the other hand, Puppet Labs is more centered around configuration management, using a declarative language to define and maintain the desired state of infrastructure and applications.
Software Support: Octopus Deploy primarily targets Windows-based applications and environments, providing native support for .NET and Windows-based technologies. In contrast, Puppet Labs is platform-agnostic and supports a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix, making it suitable for heterogeneous environments.
Agent-Based vs. Agentless: Octopus Deploy follows an agent-based architecture, where agents are installed on target machines to facilitate communication and execution of deployment tasks. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, employs an agentless approach by using SSH or WinRM protocols to interact with nodes, eliminating the need for agent installation.
Workflow Automation: Octopus Deploy offers a visual deployment pipeline that allows users to create complex deployment workflows with ease, incorporating manual interventions, approvals, and rollbacks. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, focuses on automating configuration tasks through predefined modules and manifests, enabling consistent infrastructure management.
Community and Ecosystem: Octopus Deploy has a smaller but dedicated community that provides extensions, integrations, and support through forums and documentation. Puppet Labs, being open-source, has a larger community contributing to a vast library of modules and plugins, along with robust community support.
Cost and Licensing: Octopus Deploy is a commercial product with a licensing model based on the number of deployment targets, offering more extensive support and enterprise features. Puppet Labs, while offering a free open-source version, provides commercial editions with additional features and support options for larger organizations.

In Summary, Octopus Deploy focuses on deployment automation and releases management for Windows environments, while Puppet Labs specializes in cross-platform configuration management using a declarative approach in a broader ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Puppet Labs, Octopus Deploy

Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Puppet Labs	Octopus Deploy
Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.	Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.
Insight- Puppet Enterprise's event inspector gives immediate and actionable insight into your environment, showing you what changed, where and how by classes, nodes and resources.;Discovery- Puppet Enterprise delivers a dynamic and fully-pluggable discovery service that allows you to take advantage of any data source or real-time query results to quickly locate, identify and group cloud nodes.;Provisioning- Automatically provision and configure bare metal, virtual, and private or public cloud capacity, all from a single pane. Save time getting your cloud projects off the ground by reusing the same configuration modules you set up for your physical deployments.;Configuration Management- Puppet Enterprise's declarative, model-based approach automates repetitive tasks and eliminates configuration drift. You define the desired state of your infrastructure, and Puppet Enterprise enforces this state, freeing you to work on tougher projects.;Orchestration- Quickly deploy critical updates, like security patches, across hundreds of servers in seconds, or proactively initiate Puppet runs to update configurations and report changes. Puppet Enterprise allows you to orchestrate controlled, multi-step operations to targeted collections of nodes, giving you complete control over infrastructure changes.;Reporting- Get visibility into your infrastructure, browse resources, and view reports that help you manage your configuration. Puppet Enterprise provides node hardware and software inventory, Puppet run change reports, and node configuration graphs via the product's console or 3rd party APIs.	Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 407
Followers 793	Followers 493
Votes 227	Votes 118
Pros & Cons
Pros 52 Devops 44 Automate it 26 Reusable components 21 Dynamic and idempotent server configuration 18 Great community Cons 3 Steep learning curve 1 Customs types idempotence	Pros 30 Powerful 25 Simplicity 20 Easy to learn 17 .Net oriented 14 Easy to manage releases and rollback Cons 4 Poor UI 2 Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git) 2 Management of Config
Integrations
No integrations available	Jenkins Azure DevOps TeamCity Jira Appveyor Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Puppet Labs, Octopus Deploy?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Distelli

Build, test, and deploy your code from GitHub and BitBucket (or no repository at all) to any server in the world regardless of provider. Distelli customers iterate and ship faster with complete transparency.

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Related Comparisons

Octopus Deploy vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Introducing the key differences between Octopus Deploy and Puppet Labs:

Deployment Approach: Octopus Deploy focuses on simplifying deployment processes by providing a user-friendly interface for managing releases and automating deployments across different environments. On the other hand, Puppet Labs is more centered around configuration management, using a declarative language to define and maintain the desired state of infrastructure and applications.
Software Support: Octopus Deploy primarily targets Windows-based applications and environments, providing native support for .NET and Windows-based technologies. In contrast, Puppet Labs is platform-agnostic and supports a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix, making it suitable for heterogeneous environments.
Agent-Based vs. Agentless: Octopus Deploy follows an agent-based architecture, where agents are installed on target machines to facilitate communication and execution of deployment tasks. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, employs an agentless approach by using SSH or WinRM protocols to interact with nodes, eliminating the need for agent installation.
Workflow Automation: Octopus Deploy offers a visual deployment pipeline that allows users to create complex deployment workflows with ease, incorporating manual interventions, approvals, and rollbacks. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, focuses on automating configuration tasks through predefined modules and manifests, enabling consistent infrastructure management.
Community and Ecosystem: Octopus Deploy has a smaller but dedicated community that provides extensions, integrations, and support through forums and documentation. Puppet Labs, being open-source, has a larger community contributing to a vast library of modules and plugins, along with robust community support.
Cost and Licensing: Octopus Deploy is a commercial product with a licensing model based on the number of deployment targets, offering more extensive support and enterprise features. Puppet Labs, while offering a free open-source version, provides commercial editions with additional features and support options for larger organizations.

Octopus Deploy vs Puppet Labs

Overview