Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Octopus Deploy vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?
Introducing the key differences between Octopus Deploy and Puppet Labs:
Deployment Approach: Octopus Deploy focuses on simplifying deployment processes by providing a user-friendly interface for managing releases and automating deployments across different environments. On the other hand, Puppet Labs is more centered around configuration management, using a declarative language to define and maintain the desired state of infrastructure and applications.
Software Support: Octopus Deploy primarily targets Windows-based applications and environments, providing native support for .NET and Windows-based technologies. In contrast, Puppet Labs is platform-agnostic and supports a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix, making it suitable for heterogeneous environments.
Agent-Based vs. Agentless: Octopus Deploy follows an agent-based architecture, where agents are installed on target machines to facilitate communication and execution of deployment tasks. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, employs an agentless approach by using SSH or WinRM protocols to interact with nodes, eliminating the need for agent installation.
Workflow Automation: Octopus Deploy offers a visual deployment pipeline that allows users to create complex deployment workflows with ease, incorporating manual interventions, approvals, and rollbacks. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, focuses on automating configuration tasks through predefined modules and manifests, enabling consistent infrastructure management.
Community and Ecosystem: Octopus Deploy has a smaller but dedicated community that provides extensions, integrations, and support through forums and documentation. Puppet Labs, being open-source, has a larger community contributing to a vast library of modules and plugins, along with robust community support.
Cost and Licensing: Octopus Deploy is a commercial product with a licensing model based on the number of deployment targets, offering more extensive support and enterprise features. Puppet Labs, while offering a free open-source version, provides commercial editions with additional features and support options for larger organizations.
In Summary, Octopus Deploy focuses on deployment automation and releases management for Windows environments, while Puppet Labs specializes in cross-platform configuration management using a declarative approach in a broader ecosystem.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Octopus Deploy
- Powerful30
- Simplicity25
- Easy to learn20
- .Net oriented17
- Easy to manage releases and rollback14
- Allows multitenancy8
- Nice interface4
Pros of Puppet Labs
- Devops52
- Automate it44
- Reusable components26
- Dynamic and idempotent server configuration21
- Great community18
- Very scalable12
- Cloud management12
- Easy to maintain10
- Free tier9
- Works with Amazon EC26
- Declarative4
- Ruby4
- Works with Azure3
- Works with OpenStack3
- Nginx2
- Ease of use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Octopus Deploy
- Poor UI4
- Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)2
- Management of Config2
Cons of Puppet Labs
- Steep learning curve3
- Customs types idempotence1