OpenGL vs WebGL

Overview

WebGL

Stacks183

Followers200

Votes0

OpenGL

Stacks174

Followers183

Votes0

OpenGL vs WebGL: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides key differences between OpenGL and WebGL, formatted for use in a website.

Memory Management: In OpenGL, memory management is done manually by the programmer, allowing more control but also increasing the chances of errors. On the other hand, in WebGL, memory management is handled automatically by the browser, making it easier to handle and reducing the chances of memory-related errors.
Platform Independence: OpenGL is a cross-platform graphics API, meaning it can run on different operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux. In contrast, WebGL is primarily designed to run on web browsers, leveraging the existing browser infrastructure for rendering graphics. However, with the use of tools like Emscripten, OpenGL can be compiled to run in a web browser.
API Functions: OpenGL provides a larger set of API functions and features compared to WebGL. This is because OpenGL has been developed over a longer period and has support for many advanced graphics techniques. WebGL, being a subset of OpenGL, has a reduced set of features to ensure compatibility and security in web browsers.
Programming Language: OpenGL is typically used with languages like C and C++, allowing high performance and low-level control over the graphics pipeline. On the other hand, WebGL is designed to be used with JavaScript, a higher-level language that is commonly used for web development. This makes WebGL more accessible to web developers but can limit certain performance optimizations.
Security Restrictions: WebGL runs within the security sandbox of the web browser, which imposes certain restrictions to prevent malicious activities. This includes limited access to the GPU, preventing direct memory access, and strict cross-origin policies. OpenGL, being a native API, does not have these restrictions, allowing more flexibility but also potentially posing security risks if not handled properly.
Deployment and Installation: OpenGL is typically pre-installed on operating systems or can be easily installed, making it readily available for use. In contrast, WebGL does not require any installation as it is natively supported by web browsers. This simplifies deployment as users only need a compatible web browser to run WebGL applications.

In summary, key differences between OpenGL and WebGL include memory management, platform independence, API functions, programming language, security restrictions, and deployment/installation methods.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

WebGL	OpenGL
It is integrated completely into all the web standards of the browser allowing GPU accelerated usage of physics and image processing and effects as part of the web page canvas. Its elements can be mixed with other HTML elements.	It is a cross-language, cross-platform application programming interface for rendering 2D and 3D vector graphics. The API is typically used to interact with a graphics processing unit, to achieve hardware-accelerated rendering.
Statistics
Stacks 183	Stacks 174
Followers 200	Followers 183
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to WebGL, OpenGL?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

OpenGL vs WebGL: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides key differences between OpenGL and WebGL, formatted for use in a website.

Memory Management: In OpenGL, memory management is done manually by the programmer, allowing more control but also increasing the chances of errors. On the other hand, in WebGL, memory management is handled automatically by the browser, making it easier to handle and reducing the chances of memory-related errors.
Platform Independence: OpenGL is a cross-platform graphics API, meaning it can run on different operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux. In contrast, WebGL is primarily designed to run on web browsers, leveraging the existing browser infrastructure for rendering graphics. However, with the use of tools like Emscripten, OpenGL can be compiled to run in a web browser.
API Functions: OpenGL provides a larger set of API functions and features compared to WebGL. This is because OpenGL has been developed over a longer period and has support for many advanced graphics techniques. WebGL, being a subset of OpenGL, has a reduced set of features to ensure compatibility and security in web browsers.
Programming Language: OpenGL is typically used with languages like C and C++, allowing high performance and low-level control over the graphics pipeline. On the other hand, WebGL is designed to be used with JavaScript, a higher-level language that is commonly used for web development. This makes WebGL more accessible to web developers but can limit certain performance optimizations.
Security Restrictions: WebGL runs within the security sandbox of the web browser, which imposes certain restrictions to prevent malicious activities. This includes limited access to the GPU, preventing direct memory access, and strict cross-origin policies. OpenGL, being a native API, does not have these restrictions, allowing more flexibility but also potentially posing security risks if not handled properly.
Deployment and Installation: OpenGL is typically pre-installed on operating systems or can be easily installed, making it readily available for use. In contrast, WebGL does not require any installation as it is natively supported by web browsers. This simplifies deployment as users only need a compatible web browser to run WebGL applications.

In summary, key differences between OpenGL and WebGL include memory management, platform independence, API functions, programming language, security restrictions, and deployment/installation methods.