StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Pact vs Pactflow

Pact vs Pactflow

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pact
Pact
Stacks59
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars221
Forks90
Pactflow
Pactflow
Stacks8
Followers22
Votes0

Pact vs Pactflow: What are the differences?

Pact is a framework for consumer-driven contract testing, allowing teams to define and verify contracts between services, while Pactflow is a fully managed platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution that simplifies Pact contract testing with cloud-based hosting and collaboration features.

  1. Hosting and Management: Pact is a framework for consumer-driven contract testing that can be used locally or integrated into CI/CD pipelines, while Pactflow is a fully managed platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution for Pact contract testing, providing cloud-based hosting, management, and collaboration features.

  2. Collaboration and Visibility: Pactflow offers advanced collaboration features such as team-based access controls, shared contract repositories, and real-time insights into contract testing results, fostering collaboration among development teams and stakeholders. Pact, being a framework, lacks built-in collaboration features and requires manual setup for sharing and managing contracts among teams.

  3. Integration Ecosystem: Pactflow provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools, version control systems, and notification services out of the box, streamlining the adoption of Pact contract testing into existing development workflows. While Pact can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, setting up integrations may require additional effort and customization.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Pactflow is designed to handle the scalability and performance requirements of large-scale organizations and projects, offering dedicated infrastructure and optimized performance for managing a large number of contracts and test results. Pact, being a local framework, may face scalability limitations and performance issues when used in large, distributed teams or projects.

  5. Security and Compliance: Pactflow provides enterprise-grade security features such as data encryption, role-based access controls, and compliance with industry standards and regulations, ensuring the protection and privacy of sensitive contract data. Pact, being self-hosted or locally deployed, may require additional effort to implement security best practices and ensure compliance with organizational policies.

  6. Support and Maintenance: Pactflow offers dedicated support services, including technical assistance, training resources, and SLAs for issue resolution, providing organizations with peace of mind and assurance of ongoing support for their Pact contract testing initiatives. Pact, being an open-source framework, relies on community support and may have varying levels of available resources and expertise for troubleshooting and maintenance.

In summary, Pact provides a framework for teams to implement consumer-driven contract testing locally or integrate it into CI/CD pipelines, offering flexibility and control over the testing process. Pactflow, on the other hand, offers a managed platform that streamlines the adoption of Pact contract testing by providing cloud-based hosting, collaboration tools, and integrations with CI/CD pipelines, making it easier for teams to implement and scale contract testing initiatives.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pact
Pact
Pactflow
Pactflow

It is a code-first tool for testing HTTP and message integrations using contract tests. Contract tests assert that inter-application messages conform to a shared understanding that is documented in a contract. Without contract testing, the only way to ensure that applications will work correctly together is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.

Deploy into production with impunity, and have visibility into the integration of your stack. It ensures that all components are communicating correctly before a release, without costly and brittle integration tests. We integrate with Pact and Spring Cloud Contract, enabling powerful collaboration features for the enterprise.

Support for JavaScript, JVM, .NET, Python, Go, Ruby, PHP, Swift and more; Get fast, reliable feedback on the compatibility of your integrations; Ensures all your services are compatible with each other before you deploy
Integration: Integrates with Pact and Spring Cloud Contract contract testing frameworks; Webhook management: integrate Webhooks to orchestrate a CI/CD pipeline; SSO: Login with Google, Github or an OIDC/SAML provider; Verification results: Get instant feedback on failed tests and pinpoint which API interaction failed; Secrets management: store encrypted values for use in Webhooks; Auditing: integrate into your SOC through our Audit API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
221
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
90
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59
Stacks
8
Followers
79
Followers
22
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Swift
Swift
GitHub
GitHub
Spring Cloud
Spring Cloud

What are some alternatives to Pact, Pactflow?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp