Pact vs Retrofit

Overview

Retrofit

Stacks386

Followers198

Votes0

GitHub Stars43.8K

Forks7.3K

Pact

Stacks59

Followers79

Votes0

GitHub Stars221

Forks90

Pact vs Retrofit: What are the differences?

Architecture: Pact is a consumer-driven contracts testing tool whereas Retrofit is a type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java. Pact focuses on ensuring that the consumer and producer can communicate correctly, while Retrofit simplifies the process of sending network requests.
Use Case: Pact is ideal for testing interactions between microservices, ensuring that they can communicate effectively. On the other hand, Retrofit is commonly used in Android development to manage network requests and responses in a type-safe manner.
Language Support: Pact supports testing for various languages like Java, Ruby, and Python, making it versatile for different development environments. In contrast, Retrofit is specifically tailored for Java and Android development, limiting its usage to these platforms.
Testing Approach: Pact uses consumer-driven contracts to ensure that the consumer and provider agree on the format of the data being exchanged. Retrofit, on the other hand, focuses on providing a clean and concise way to make HTTP requests and handle responses on Android platforms.
Community Support: Retrofit has a larger community and ecosystem, providing more resources and support for developers using the library. Pact, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community base for troubleshooting and assistance.
Complexity: Retrofit simplifies the process of making network calls and handling responses, making it easier for developers to work with APIs. Pact, on the other hand, involves setting up contracts between services, which can add complexity to the testing process.

In Summary, Pact and Retrofit differ in their architecture, use case, language support, testing approach, community support, and complexity, offering varied functionalities for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Retrofit	Pact
Retrofit turns your HTTP API into a Java interface	It is a code-first tool for testing HTTP and message integrations using contract tests. Contract tests assert that inter-application messages conform to a shared understanding that is documented in a contract. Without contract testing, the only way to ensure that applications will work correctly together is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.
URL parameter replacement and query parameter support; Object conversion to request body (e.g., JSON, protocol buffers); Multipart request body and file upload	Support for JavaScript, JVM, .NET, Python, Go, Ruby, PHP, Swift and more; Get fast, reliable feedback on the compatibility of your integrations; Ensures all your services are compatible with each other before you deploy
Statistics
GitHub Stars 43.8K	GitHub Stars 221
GitHub Forks 7.3K	GitHub Forks 90
Stacks 386	Stacks 59
Followers 198	Followers 79
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript Ruby Python .NET Golang PHP Swift

What are some alternatives to Retrofit, Pact?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

Pact vs Retrofit: What are the differences?

Architecture: Pact is a consumer-driven contracts testing tool whereas Retrofit is a type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java. Pact focuses on ensuring that the consumer and producer can communicate correctly, while Retrofit simplifies the process of sending network requests.
Use Case: Pact is ideal for testing interactions between microservices, ensuring that they can communicate effectively. On the other hand, Retrofit is commonly used in Android development to manage network requests and responses in a type-safe manner.
Language Support: Pact supports testing for various languages like Java, Ruby, and Python, making it versatile for different development environments. In contrast, Retrofit is specifically tailored for Java and Android development, limiting its usage to these platforms.
Testing Approach: Pact uses consumer-driven contracts to ensure that the consumer and provider agree on the format of the data being exchanged. Retrofit, on the other hand, focuses on providing a clean and concise way to make HTTP requests and handle responses on Android platforms.
Community Support: Retrofit has a larger community and ecosystem, providing more resources and support for developers using the library. Pact, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community base for troubleshooting and assistance.
Complexity: Retrofit simplifies the process of making network calls and handling responses, making it easier for developers to work with APIs. Pact, on the other hand, involves setting up contracts between services, which can add complexity to the testing process.

In Summary, Pact and Retrofit differ in their architecture, use case, language support, testing approach, community support, and complexity, offering varied functionalities for developers.

Pact vs Retrofit

Overview