StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Paw vs Swagger UI

Paw vs Swagger UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Paw
Paw
Stacks233
Followers277
Votes164
Swagger UI
Swagger UI
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes207
GitHub Stars28.3K
Forks9.2K

Paw vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to API development and documentation, both Paw and Swagger UI are popular tools used by developers. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart in terms of features and functionality.

  1. User Interface: Paw is a desktop application with a user-friendly interface that allows developers to easily design and test APIs. On the other hand, Swagger UI is a web-based tool that displays APIs in a visual, interactive format, making it easier for users to explore and test endpoints.

  2. Authentication Support: Paw provides built-in support for various authentication methods such as OAuth, Basic Auth, and JWT tokens, allowing developers to easily secure their APIs. On the contrary, Swagger UI mainly focuses on documenting APIs and does not offer extensive support for authentication mechanisms.

  3. Code Generation: Paw offers code generation capabilities that allow developers to generate client code in various programming languages based on their API specifications. In contrast, Swagger UI does not provide built-in code generation functionality, requiring developers to use third-party tools or libraries for this purpose.

  4. Collaboration Features: Paw includes features for team collaboration such as shared environments and synchronization, allowing multiple developers to work on API projects simultaneously. Swagger UI, on the other hand, lacks built-in collaboration tools and is more suited for individual developers or small teams.

  5. Customization Options: Paw offers a range of customization options for API requests and responses, allowing developers to tailor their API specifications to meet specific requirements. In comparison, Swagger UI has limited customization capabilities, primarily focusing on rendering API documentation in a standardized format.

  6. Integration with Backend Services: Paw provides integrations with popular backend services and tools, allowing developers to streamline the process of testing and deploying APIs. In contrast, Swagger UI is primarily focused on API documentation and does not offer extensive integrations with backend services out of the box.

In Summary, Paw and Swagger UI differ in terms of user interface, authentication support, code generation, collaboration features, customization options, and integration with backend services, catering to different needs of developers in the API development and documentation space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Paw, Swagger UI

StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Paw
Paw
Swagger UI
Swagger UI

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Organize your Requests, make Groups or sort by Host, Name, etc.;Easily build your requests, enjoy Formatters and Dynamic Values.;See Request and Response infos, headers, and body.;View formatted or raw HTTP Requests and Responses.;JSON Outline Viewer and Editor.;Paw supports OAuth 1 & 2, HTTP Basic Auth and Amazon S3;Paw generates ready-to-use client code
The UI works in any development environment, be it locally or in the web;Allow end developers to effortlessly interact and try out every single operation your API exposes for easy consumption;Quickly find and work with resources and endpoints with neatly categorized documentation;Cater to every possible scenario with Swagger UI working in all major browsers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
28.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
233
Stacks
2.1K
Followers
277
Followers
1.8K
Votes
164
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 46
    Great interface
  • 37
    Easy to use
  • 25
    More stable and performant than the others
  • 16
    Saves endpoints list for testing
  • 13
    Supports environment variables
Cons
  • 3
    It's not free
  • 2
    MacOS Only
Pros
  • 49
    Open Source
  • 34
    Can execute api calls from the documentation
  • 29
    Free to use
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 14
    Easy to implement in .Net
Cons
  • 3
    Need to learn YAML and RAML
  • 2
    Documentation doesn't look that good
  • 1
    Does not support hypermedia
  • 1
    You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
  • 1
    Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Git
Git
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Paw, Swagger UI?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope