Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Laravel Spark vs PayPal: What are the differences?
Introduction: Here, we will highlight the key differences between Laravel Spark and PayPal to help you understand which one suits your needs better.
Payment Processing Integration: Laravel Spark is an application starter kit that includes subscription billing functionality, making it easier for developers to incorporate payment processing into their applications. On the other hand, PayPal is a third-party payment processing platform that allows businesses to accept payments through various methods like credit cards, PayPal accounts, and more.
Subscription Management Features: Laravel Spark includes built-in features for managing subscriptions, such as recurring billing, plan upgrades/downgrades, and user management. While PayPal offers subscription management tools, they may not be as extensive and tailored to specific needs as Laravel Spark's features, which are designed to streamline the subscription process.
Customization and Flexibility: Laravel Spark provides a customizable framework for developers to build subscription-based applications quickly and efficiently. With Spark, developers have more control over the customization and scalability of their applications. In contrast, PayPal offers a more standardized payment processing solution, with less room for customization and tailoring to specific business requirements.
Integration and Compatibility: Laravel Spark is specifically designed to work well with Laravel applications, ensuring seamless integration and compatibility. On the other hand, PayPal is a standalone payment processing platform that can be integrated into different platforms and frameworks, offering a wider range of compatibility but potentially requiring more effort in integration.
Customer Support and Documentation: Laravel Spark comes with dedicated customer support and comprehensive documentation to help developers navigate the subscription management process effectively. PayPal also offers customer support, but the level of assistance may vary depending on the plan or service used. Additionally, the documentation for integrating PayPal may not be as Laravel-specific as Spark's documentation.
Cost and Pricing Structure: Laravel Spark requires a one-time purchase fee for developers to access the starter kit and subscription management features. On the other hand, PayPal's pricing structure is based on transaction fees or subscription fees, depending on the plan chosen. Depending on the volume of transactions and specific needs, one platform may be more cost-effective for your business than the other.
In Summary, Laravel Spark offers a more tailored subscription management solution with customizable features, while PayPal provides a broader payment processing platform with more flexibility in terms of integration and compatibility.
We use GoCardless to simplify the way clients and partners pay for our services. What intrigued us is the quick and easy ACH feature that gives our clients the option to log in with their bank account and shoot the funds directly to our account. The fee, compared to Stripe is less. Stripe and PayPal charge 2.9% + 30c and Stripe also forces the client to enter in all of their payment details manually and then if the payment doesn't work, the client has to try all over again. GoCardless charges 1% + 25c which is much more reasonable dealing with the large projects that we are currently working on.
We integrate GoCardless with Xero to easily send out quick invoices, receive the funds and track all revenue in one place.
Pros of Laravel Spark
Pros of PayPal
- Most known service196
- Consumers know it135
- It's available for many countries113
- Easy70
- Best way to get paid outside US54
- Most widely used payment processor35
- Express Checkout25
- Consumers trust it16
- Flexible and secure15
- Digital Goods for Express Checkout6
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Laravel Spark
Cons of PayPal
- Not well written recurring payment api1
- Less countries supported1
- Harder to get started with1