Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Playwright

535
579
+ 1
81
Test Studio

3
17
+ 1
0
Add tool

Playwright vs Test Studio: What are the differences?

Introduction

Playwright and Test Studio are both popular automation testing tools used for web application testing. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Scripting Language Support: Playwright supports multiple scripting languages including JavaScript, Python, and TypeScript, providing developers with flexibility to write tests in their preferred language. On the other hand, Test Studio primarily focuses on Microsoft-centric technologies and supports scripting in C#.

  2. Browser Support: Playwright supports a wide range of browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, making it a versatile tool for cross-browser testing. In comparison, Test Studio primarily focuses on Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge, restricting its browser compatibility.

  3. Parallel Execution: Playwright allows for parallel execution of tests, enabling faster test execution and reducing the overall testing time. Test Studio, on the other hand, does not provide native support for parallel execution, limiting the scalability and efficiency of test suites.

  4. Cross-Platform Support: Playwright is designed to be cross-platform, making it compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. In contrast, Test Studio is primarily designed for Windows environments, limiting its cross-platform capabilities.

  5. Community and Support: Playwright has gained significant traction and a growing community, which ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and community-driven support. Test Studio, being a commercial tool, offers support through Telerik's support channels but may have limited community-driven resources in comparison.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Playwright is an open-source tool and does not require any licensing fees, making it a cost-effective choice for automation testing. Test Studio, being a commercial tool, requires a license for usage, potentially adding to the overall cost of implementing automation testing.

Summary

In summary, Playwright and Test Studio differ in terms of scripting language support, browser compatibility, parallel execution capabilities, cross-platform support, community and support, as well as pricing and licensing. These differences should be considered when choosing an automation testing tool based on specific project requirements and preferences.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of Test Studio
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Fastest
  • 3
    Context isolation
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Playwright
    Cons of Test Studio
    • 12
      Less help
    • 3
      Node based
    • 2
      Does not execute outside of browser
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Playwright?

      It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

      What is Test Studio?

      It is a Windows-based software testing tool for web and desktop functional testing, software performance testing, load testing and mobile application testing. The tool ships with a plugin for Visual Studio and a standalone app that use the same repositories and file formats.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Playwright?
      What companies use Test Studio?
        No companies found
        Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
        Learn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Playwright?
        What tools integrate with Test Studio?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Playwright and Test Studio?
        Puppeteer
        Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        Protractor
        Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
        Cypress
        Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
        TestCafe
        It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
        See all alternatives