Portainer vs Snap CI

Overview

Snap CI

Stacks29

Followers56

Votes100

Portainer

Stacks507

Followers842

Votes146

Portainer vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Portainer and Snap CI are both software tools that are used for different purposes in the world of technology. While Portainer is a management UI for Docker, Snap CI is a continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD) platform. Despite their similarities in technology, they have key differences that make them unique in their own ways.

User Interface and Functionality: Portainer provides a user-friendly and intuitive graphical interface for managing Docker environments, making it easy for users to work with containers, images, volumes, and networks. On the other hand, Snap CI focuses on providing a streamlined CI/CD workflow with features like automated build, test, and deploy pipelines.
Deployment Options: Portainer can be deployed as a standalone application or as a Docker container, giving users the flexibility to choose their preferred deployment method. Snap CI, however, is a hosted solution that is managed and maintained by the provider, eliminating the need for users to manage their own infrastructure.
Container Orchestration: Portainer primarily focuses on managing Docker containers and does not provide advanced container orchestration features out of the box. Snap CI, on the other hand, supports multiple container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes and provides features for managing container deployments, scaling, and load balancing.
Extensibility and Integration: Portainer provides an API and CLI that allow users to programmatically interact with the tool and integrate it with other systems and tools. Snap CI, on the other hand, provides integrations with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, enabling seamless integration with the CI/CD workflow.
Pricing and Licensing: Portainer is an open-source tool that is free to use, making it an excellent choice for individuals and small teams. Snap CI, however, is a commercial tool with a subscription-based pricing model, making it more suitable for larger organizations that require advanced CI/CD capabilities and dedicated support.
Community and Support: Portainer has a large and active community of users that provide support, contribute to the project, and share their experiences. Snap CI, being a commercial product, provides dedicated support and documentation to its users, ensuring timely assistance and guidance.

In summary, Portainer is a user-friendly and open-source management UI for Docker that provides flexibility in deployment options and integrations, whereas Snap CI is a hosted CI/CD platform with advanced automation and container orchestration capabilities, suitable for larger organizations with a subscription-based pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Snap CI	Portainer
Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.	It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.
Deployment Options - Heroku, AWS;System Libraries - Your build runs on a RedHat 6-compatible system with commonly required libraries;Customization Options - In addition to all that we support out of the box, we offer you the chance to customize your build extensively.;Multi-Stage Deployment Pipelines	Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks 29	Stacks 507
Followers 56	Followers 842
Votes 100	Votes 146
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Github integration 13 Easy setup 11 Multi-stage pipelines 10 Continuous deployment 9 Easy ui	Pros 36 Simple 27 Great UI 19 Friendly 12 Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker 11 Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
Docker Slack Amazon EC2 GitHub Heroku	Docker Swarm Docker Secrets Auth0 Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Snap CI, Portainer?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

Portainer vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

User Interface and Functionality: Portainer provides a user-friendly and intuitive graphical interface for managing Docker environments, making it easy for users to work with containers, images, volumes, and networks. On the other hand, Snap CI focuses on providing a streamlined CI/CD workflow with features like automated build, test, and deploy pipelines.
Deployment Options: Portainer can be deployed as a standalone application or as a Docker container, giving users the flexibility to choose their preferred deployment method. Snap CI, however, is a hosted solution that is managed and maintained by the provider, eliminating the need for users to manage their own infrastructure.
Container Orchestration: Portainer primarily focuses on managing Docker containers and does not provide advanced container orchestration features out of the box. Snap CI, on the other hand, supports multiple container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes and provides features for managing container deployments, scaling, and load balancing.
Extensibility and Integration: Portainer provides an API and CLI that allow users to programmatically interact with the tool and integrate it with other systems and tools. Snap CI, on the other hand, provides integrations with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, enabling seamless integration with the CI/CD workflow.
Pricing and Licensing: Portainer is an open-source tool that is free to use, making it an excellent choice for individuals and small teams. Snap CI, however, is a commercial tool with a subscription-based pricing model, making it more suitable for larger organizations that require advanced CI/CD capabilities and dedicated support.
Community and Support: Portainer has a large and active community of users that provide support, contribute to the project, and share their experiences. Snap CI, being a commercial product, provides dedicated support and documentation to its users, ensuring timely assistance and guidance.

Portainer vs Snap CI

Overview

Portainer vs Snap CI: What are the differences?