StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Protractor vs Sorry-cypress

Protractor vs Sorry-cypress

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers543
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress
Stacks8
Followers31
Votes5
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks299

Protractor vs Sorry-cypress: What are the differences?

  1. Execution Speed: Protractor is slower than Sorry-cypress due to its synchronous nature, which can lead to longer execution times for larger test suites.
  2. Real-time Dashboard: Sorry-cypress provides a real-time dashboard that allows users to monitor test runs, view logs, and analyze results easily, which Protractor lacks.
  3. Parallel Testing: Sorry-cypress allows for easy parallel testing with multiple machines, making it more efficient for running tests in a distributed environment compared to Protractor.
  4. Screenshots and Videos: Sorry-cypress automatically captures screenshots and videos for each test, providing visual evidence of test runs, while in Protractor, this would require additional configuration.
  5. Customizable Analysis Tools: Sorry-cypress offers customizable analysis tools for examining test results and trends, providing more in-depth insights than the basic reporting capabilities of Protractor.
  6. Integration with CI/CD: Sorry-cypress seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions, making it easier to incorporate automated testing into the development workflow, whereas Protractor may require more manual configuration for such integrations.

In Summary, Protractor and Sorry-cypress differ in execution speed, real-time dashboard availability, parallel testing capabilities, screenshot and video capturing, analysis tools, and integration with CI/CD.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Protractor
Protractor
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
Run cypress tests in parallel with no limitations; Upload screenshots and videos to your own storage; Browse test results, screenshots and video recordings; Self-hosted - use your own infrastructure, own your data; Integrate with GitHub or anything else via webhooks; Ready to use Docker images, Kubernetes and AWS Cloud Formation template
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
299
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
8
Followers
543
Followers
31
Votes
33
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Promise support
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
Pros
  • 3
    Host your own dashboard privately
  • 2
    Free reports
Cons
  • 1
    HTML reports are not as feature rich as Cypress dash
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to Protractor, Sorry-cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

SinonJS

SinonJS

It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana