StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Protractor vs Watir

Protractor vs Watir

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers544
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K
Watir
Watir
Stacks25
Followers38
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks248

Protractor vs Watir: What are the differences?

  1. Protractor vs Watir: Protractor is mainly for testing Angular applications as it is designed to work specifically with AngularJS and Angular applications, whereas Watir is a generic web-testing tool that can be used for testing any web application irrespective of the technology used to build it.
  2. APIs and Language Support: Protractor is a wrapper around WebDriverJS and provides APIs specific to AngularJS that can be used to interact with Angular-specific elements, while Watir provides APIs that are based on the Ruby programming language and can communicate with different browsers using various drivers like Selenium.
  3. Community and Support: Protractor has a larger community and support base as it is widely used for Angular applications, which means more resources, documentation, and active development, while Watir may have a smaller community, especially for non-Ruby users, leading to possible limitations in terms of resources and support.
  4. Framework Integration: Protractor seamlessly integrates with various testing frameworks like Jasmine and Mocha, making it easier for developers to write robust test scripts for their Angular applications, whereas Watir may require additional effort to integrate with different testing frameworks due to its language-specific nature.
  5. Cross-Browser Testing: Protractor has better cross-browser testing capabilities as it supports different browsers and ensures better compatibility with Angular applications, while Watir may have limitations in terms of cross-browser testing, especially when it comes to supporting newer browser versions or technologies.
  6. Documentation and Learning Curve: Protractor has more comprehensive documentation and resources available online, making it easier for developers to learn and use the tool, while Watir may have a steeper learning curve, especially for those unfamiliar with Ruby or its syntax.

In Summary, Protractor is tailored for testing Angular applications with specific APIs and better community support, while Watir is a more general web-testing tool with Ruby-based APIs and possible limitations in cross-browser testing and framework integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Protractor, Watir

Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Protractor
Protractor
Watir
Watir

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

Watir, pronounced water, is an open-source (BSD) family of Ruby libraries for automating web browsers. It allows you to write tests that are easy to read and maintain. It is simple and flexible. Watir drives browsers the same way people do. It clicks links, fills in forms, presses buttons. Watir also checks results, such as…

Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
The test scripts are written in Ruby language; It supports multiple domains and has a test recorder; It can find elements by its name, index, ID or value.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
248
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
25
Followers
544
Followers
38
Votes
33
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Promise support
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular
Ruby
Ruby
Selenium
Selenium
Rails
Rails
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Protractor, Watir?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana