Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

PullReview
PullReview

7
32
+ 1
70
RuboCop
RuboCop

207
135
+ 1
38
Add tool

PullReview vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

PullReview: Automated code review for Ruby and Rails developers. PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code; RuboCop: A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide. RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

PullReview and RuboCop belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.

"Very detailed review of my code" is the top reason why over 17 developers like PullReview, while over 8 developers mention "Open-source" as the leading cause for choosing RuboCop.

RuboCop is an open source tool with 10.1K GitHub stars and 2.14K GitHub forks. Here's a link to RuboCop's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is PullReview?

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

What is RuboCop?

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose PullReview?
Why do developers choose RuboCop?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use PullReview?
      What companies use RuboCop?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with PullReview?
      What tools integrate with RuboCop?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to PullReview and RuboCop?
      ESLint
      A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
      SonarQube
      SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
      Prettier
      Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.
      Code Climate
      After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
      Codacy
      Codacy automates code review to improve & standardize code quality across large enterprises. It identifies issues through static code analysis. Integrates with GitLab, GitHub & Bitbucket. Supports 30+ languages
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about PullReview and RuboCop
      Francisco Quintero
      Francisco Quintero
      Tech Lead at Dev As Pros | 7 upvotes 288.2K views
      atDev As ProsDev As Pros
      Node.js
      Node.js
      Rails
      Rails
      Amazon EC2
      Amazon EC2
      Heroku
      Heroku
      RuboCop
      RuboCop
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      ESLint
      ESLint
      Slack
      Slack
      Twist
      Twist

      For many(if not all) small and medium size business time and cost matter a lot.

      That's why languages, frameworks, tools, and services that are easy to use and provide 0 to productive in less time, it's best.

      Maybe Node.js frameworks might provide better features compared to Rails but in terms of MVPs, for us Rails is the leading alternative.

      Amazon EC2 might be cheaper and more customizable than Heroku but in the initial terms of a project, you need to complete configurationos and deploy early.

      Advanced configurations can be done down the road, when the project is running and making money, not before.

      But moving fast isn't the only thing we care about. We also take the job to leave a good codebase from the beginning and because of that we try to follow, as much as we can, style guides in Ruby with RuboCop and in JavaScript with ESLint and StandardJS.

      Finally, comunication and keeping a good history of conversations, decisions, and discussions is important so we use a mix of Slack and Twist

      See more
      Jerome Dalbert
      Jerome Dalbert
      Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare | 5 upvotes 279.4K views
      atStackShareStackShare
      GitHub
      GitHub
      CircleCI
      CircleCI
      Code Climate
      Code Climate
      Brakeman
      Brakeman
      RuboCop
      RuboCop
      RSpec
      RSpec
      Rails
      Rails
      Git
      Git
      #ContinuousIntegration

      The continuous integration process for our Rails backend app starts by opening a GitHub pull request. This triggers a CircleCI build and some Code Climate checks.

      The CircleCI build is a workflow that runs the following jobs:

      • check for security vulnerabilities with Brakeman
      • check code quality with RuboCop
      • run RSpec tests in parallel with the knapsack gem, and output test coverage reports with the simplecov gem
      • upload test coverage to Code Climate

      Code Climate checks the following:

      • code quality metrics like code complexity
      • test coverage minimum thresholds

      The CircleCI jobs and Code Climate checks above have corresponding GitHub status checks.

      Once all the mandatory GitHub checks pass and the code+functionality have been reviewed, developers can merge their pull request into our Git master branch. Code is then ready to deploy!

      #ContinuousIntegration

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of PullReview and RuboCop
      Review ofPullReviewPullReview

      PullReview is an amazing tool to improve your workflow by doing code review without having to intervene. Just push your feature branches and wait for the review to finish. This ensures you don't have to stop coding while you reap the benefits of spotting mistakes or code that needs a refactor before it is merged.

      The team is helpful, responds quickly and knows their stuff. Give it a go!

      Review ofPullReviewPullReview

      I liked how fast it all went with installing Pull Review and also that in a glance I know on which part I still have to work to become better. Last but not least, responsiveness is one of the team's strength: whenever you'd need help or have a question, they'll reply in no time. Totally recommended!

      Review ofPullReviewPullReview

      Very helpful code review. Team very quick to respond to issues problems.

      How developers use PullReview and RuboCop
      No items found
      How much does PullReview cost?
      How much does RuboCop cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      News about PullReview
      More news