PullReview vs RuboCop: What are the differences?
PullReview: Automated code review for Ruby and Rails developers. PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code; RuboCop: A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide. RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
PullReview and RuboCop belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.
"Very detailed review of my code" is the top reason why over 17 developers like PullReview, while over 8 developers mention "Open-source" as the leading cause for choosing RuboCop.
RuboCop is an open source tool with 10.1K GitHub stars and 2.14K GitHub forks. Here's a link to RuboCop's open source repository on GitHub.
What is PullReview?
What is RuboCop?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using PullReview?
What are the cons of using RuboCop?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
For many(if not all) small and medium size business time and cost matter a lot.
That's why languages, frameworks, tools, and services that are easy to use and provide 0 to productive in less time, it's best.
Maybe Node.js frameworks might provide better features compared to Rails but in terms of MVPs, for us Rails is the leading alternative.
Amazon EC2 might be cheaper and more customizable than Heroku but in the initial terms of a project, you need to complete configurationos and deploy early.
Advanced configurations can be done down the road, when the project is running and making money, not before.
Finally, comunication and keeping a good history of conversations, decisions, and discussions is important so we use a mix of Slack and Twist
The continuous integration process for our Rails backend app starts by opening a GitHub pull request. This triggers a CircleCI build and some Code Climate checks.
The CircleCI build is a workflow that runs the following jobs:
- check for security vulnerabilities with Brakeman
- check code quality with RuboCop
- run RSpec tests in parallel with the knapsack gem, and output test coverage reports with the simplecov gem
- upload test coverage to Code Climate
Code Climate checks the following:
- code quality metrics like code complexity
- test coverage minimum thresholds
The CircleCI jobs and Code Climate checks above have corresponding GitHub status checks.
Once all the mandatory GitHub checks pass and the code+functionality have been reviewed, developers can merge their pull request into our Git
master branch. Code is then ready to deploy!
PullReview is an amazing tool to improve your workflow by doing code review without having to intervene. Just push your feature branches and wait for the review to finish. This ensures you don't have to stop coding while you reap the benefits of spotting mistakes or code that needs a refactor before it is merged.
The team is helpful, responds quickly and knows their stuff. Give it a go!
I liked how fast it all went with installing Pull Review and also that in a glance I know on which part I still have to work to become better. Last but not least, responsiveness is one of the team's strength: whenever you'd need help or have a question, they'll reply in no time. Totally recommended!
Very helpful code review. Team very quick to respond to issues problems.