StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Pylint vs Pyright

Pylint vs Pyright

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pylint
Pylint
Stacks526
Followers97
Votes17
Pyright
Pyright
Stacks32
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks1.7K

Pylint vs Pyright: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Pylint and Pyright

  1. Mode of Operation: Pylint is a static code analysis tool for Python that examines the source code, identifies potential errors, enforces coding standards, and provides suggestions for improvement. On the other hand, Pyright is a static type checking tool that focuses specifically on type checking and inference for Python code.

  2. Type Checking Approach: Pylint uses a more traditional and flexible type inference approach, where it infers types by analyzing the code at runtime. In contrast, Pyright uses the Language Server Protocol and Microsoft's Pyright language server implementation to perform type checking and inference based on static code analysis.

  3. Performance: Pylint can be slower than Pyright, especially when analyzing large codebases, mainly due to its more extensive analysis capabilities. Pyright, being designed as a type checker, has been optimized for faster type analysis, providing quicker feedback on type-related issues.

  4. Integration with Editors: Pylint integrates well with various text editors and IDEs, such as Visual Studio Code, Sublime Text, and Atom. It provides real-time feedback, highlighting issues and suggestions within the editor. Pyright, built on the Language Server Protocol, offers similar editor integration features with its language server, making it easy to integrate with compatible editors.

  5. Type System Support: Pylint has limited support for type hinting, as it primarily relies on runtime code analysis. It can recognize basic types but may struggle with more complex type annotations or inference. Pyright, being primarily a type checker, has robust support for Python's type hinting syntax, enabling it to catch more subtle type-related errors and provide accurate type inference.

In summary, Pylint is a comprehensive static analysis tool that covers various aspects of code quality, while Pyright is a specialized type checker focused on providing accurate type checking and inference for Python code. Pyright offers faster performance and better support for type hinting, while Pylint excels at more extensive code analysis and adherence to coding standards.

Detailed Comparison

Pylint
Pylint
Pyright
Pyright

It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.

Typically 5x or more faster than mypy and other type checkers that are written in Python. It is meant for large Python source bases. It can run in a “watch” mode and performs fast incremental updates when files are modified.

Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings
Hover tool tips that display type information; Links to symbol definitions; Smart priority queuing for interactive feedback during editing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
526
Stacks
32
Followers
97
Followers
31
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Command Line
  • 2
    Spell Check strings & comments
  • 2
    Code score & directions
  • 2
    Pre-commit checks
  • 2
    IDE Integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Debian
Debian
Vim
Vim
Windows
Windows
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
TextMate
TextMate
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Komodo IDE
Komodo IDE
Eclipse
Eclipse
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
TypeScript
TypeScript
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to Pylint, Pyright?

CoffeeScript

CoffeeScript

It adds syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python and Haskell in an effort to enhance JavaScript's brevity and readability. Specific additional features include list comprehension and de-structuring assignment.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana