StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. PythonAnywhere vs Socket.IO

PythonAnywhere vs Socket.IO

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Socket.IO
Socket.IO
Stacks13.6K
Followers11.0K
Votes776
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Stacks90
Followers293
Votes64

PythonAnywhere vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction

PythonAnywhere and Socket.IO are both tools used in web development, but they serve different purposes. PythonAnywhere is an online integrated development environment (IDE) and web hosting service for Python applications, while Socket.IO is a JavaScript library that enables real-time, bidirectional communication between clients and servers.

  1. Hosting and Deployment: One key difference between PythonAnywhere and Socket.IO is their primary focus. PythonAnywhere is primarily designed for hosting and deploying Python web applications, providing a platform for development and deployment. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a library that enables real-time communication between clients and servers using websockets, making it useful for creating interactive web applications that require constant data exchange.

  2. Language Support: Another difference lies in the programming languages they support. PythonAnywhere, as the name suggests, is specifically designed for Python applications and provides a Python-friendly environment. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library, meaning it is primarily used for web applications developed in JavaScript. While PythonAnywhere does support other programming languages to some extent, such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, its main focus remains on Python.

  3. Development Environment: PythonAnywhere provides an integrated development environment (IDE) where developers can write, test, and debug their Python code directly in the browser. It offers features like syntax highlighting, code autocompletion, and a console for interactive Python sessions. Socket.IO, on the other hand, does not provide a dedicated development environment. It is primarily used as a library that can be integrated into existing JavaScript applications.

  4. Real-time Communication: Socket.IO excels in facilitating real-time communication between clients and servers using websockets. It provides a toolkit for creating bidirectional, event-based communication channels that enable real-time updates and instant messaging capabilities. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, focuses more on hosting and deployment of Python applications, rather than real-time communication.

  5. Scalability and Functionality: When it comes to scalability and functionality, PythonAnywhere provides a comprehensive hosting environment that allows for the deployment of entire web applications. It offers features like database integration, scheduled tasks, and various web frameworks to build robust and scalable applications. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is more focused on the real-time communication aspect and does not provide a complete hosting environment. It serves as a complement to existing web applications rather than a standalone hosting solution.

  6. Ease of Use: PythonAnywhere aims to provide a user-friendly and beginner-friendly environment for Python web development. It offers a visually accessible interface and provides step-by-step instructions for setting up and deploying web applications. Socket.IO, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with JavaScript and websockets.

In summary, PythonAnywhere is a web hosting service and IDE primarily focused on Python applications, providing a comprehensive hosting environment with ease of use. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library that enables real-time communication between clients and servers using websockets, offering a toolkit for creating interactive web applications with real-time updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Socket.IO, PythonAnywhere

Noam
Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJSReactReact

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M
Comments
Anil
Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Socket.IO
Socket.IO
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Real-time analytics - Push data to clients that gets represented as real-time counters, charts or logs.;Binary streaming - Starting in 1.0, it's possible to send any blob back and forth: image, audio, video.;Instant messaging and chat - Socket.IO's "Hello world" is a chat app in just a few lines of code.;Document collaboration - Allow users to concurrently edit a document and see each other's changes.
-
Statistics
Stacks
13.6K
Stacks
90
Followers
11.0K
Followers
293
Votes
776
Votes
64
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 12
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 3
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Websocket Errors
  • 2
    Small community
Pros
  • 15
    Web apps
  • 11
    Easy Setup
  • 8
    Free plan
  • 8
    Shell access
  • 8
    Great support
Cons
  • 1
    Really small community
  • 1
    No root access
Integrations
Auth0
Auth0
Gatsby
Gatsby
Flutter
Flutter
React
React
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
Outbrain
Outbrain
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Socket.IO, PythonAnywhere?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase