Qbaka vs TrackJS: What are the differences?
Qbaka can be classified as a tool in the "Font-end Performance Monitoring" category, while TrackJS is grouped under "Exception Monitoring".
Some of the features offered by Qbaka are:
- Smart error grouping
- Stacktraces extraction
- Raw data: user IP, timezone, url, browser, etc
On the other hand, TrackJS provides the following key features:
- Telemetry Timeline: More than just an error. The Telemetry Timeline shows the user, network, and console events that preceded an error, like an airplane's BlackBox for your webapp.
- Realtime Dashboard: Compare the hits and errors for your webapp over time. See if a recent change is causing failures, and where to prioritize debugging.
- Intelligence Alerting: Get notified when issues important to you are happening, right to your email or chat room.
What is Qbaka?
What is TrackJS?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Qbaka?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Qbaka?
What are the cons of using TrackJS?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Qbaka?