Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Qbaka
Qbaka

2
3
+ 1
0
TrackJS
TrackJS

3.3K
103
+ 1
26
Add tool

Qbaka vs TrackJS: What are the differences?

Developers describe Qbaka as "Smart frontend error monitoring and analytics, JavaScript error tracking". Qbaka automatically collects errors without user interation. Whenever error happen, it is collected by Qbaka and developers get maximum helpful data to fix the problem. On the other hand, TrackJS is detailed as "JavaScript Error Monitoring for Modern Web Applications". Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them.

Qbaka can be classified as a tool in the "Font-end Performance Monitoring" category, while TrackJS is grouped under "Exception Monitoring".

Some of the features offered by Qbaka are:

  • Smart error grouping
  • Stacktraces extraction
  • Raw data: user IP, timezone, url, browser, etc

On the other hand, TrackJS provides the following key features:

  • Telemetry Timeline: More than just an error. The Telemetry Timeline shows the user, network, and console events that preceded an error, like an airplane's BlackBox for your webapp.
  • Realtime Dashboard: Compare the hits and errors for your webapp over time. See if a recent change is causing failures, and where to prioritize debugging.
  • Intelligence Alerting: Get notified when issues important to you are happening, right to your email or chat room.
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Qbaka?

Qbaka automatically collects errors without user interation. Whenever error happen, it is collected by Qbaka and developers get maximum helpful data to fix the problem.

What is TrackJS?

Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Qbaka?
Why do developers choose TrackJS?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Qbaka?
        What companies use TrackJS?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Qbaka?
        What tools integrate with TrackJS?
          No integrations found
          What are some alternatives to Qbaka and TrackJS?
          SpeedCurve
          SpeedCurve gives you continuous feedback on how your front-end code is affecting the performance of your website. Get detailed build analysis and performance filmstrips for your own website and then benchmark your performance against the competition to make sure your website loads faster.
          Atatus
          Atatus is a server and frontend monitoring SaaS, using which you can monitor the performance and track the errors of your app.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about Qbaka and TrackJS
          No stack decisions found
          Interest over time
          Reviews of Qbaka and TrackJS
          Review ofTrackJSTrackJS

          I'm really glad to use TrackJs. I started several months ago, and since then, I've purchased two licences for two different entreprises, a big one and a small one. In both cases, I've been able to detect and correct many hidden javascript errors that, until then, were almost impossible to detect and reproduce. In many cases, TrackJs provides a stack trace along with the error, an unvaluable help to figure out what's going on and how to fix it. Thanks to TrackJs, application quality is better, and maintenance costs are lower. During testing, TracksJs is the perfect match for automated user interface tests. And when we put new changes in production, we will know from the very start if something's going wrong, because TrackJs provides a real time dashboard. And all these benefits come at no cost, as integration is really straightforward. I don't think it's wise to develop web applications without it.

          How developers use Qbaka and TrackJS
          Avatar of Alexpts Pts
          Alexpts Pts uses TrackJSTrackJS
          How much does Qbaka cost?
          How much does TrackJS cost?
          News about Qbaka
          More news
          News about TrackJS
          More news