QMetry vs Testrail

Overview

Testrail

Stacks218

Followers265

Votes30

QMetry

Stacks15

Followers34

Votes0

QMetry vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown code provides a comparison between QMetry and Testrail, highlighting the key differences between the two test management tools.

Integration with Automation Tools: QMetry offers seamless integration with a wide range of automation tools, allowing users to easily execute and manage automated test scripts. Testrail, on the other hand, has limited integration options with automation tools, which may require additional efforts for synchronization.
Reporting and Metrics: QMetry provides comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing users to generate detailed test execution reports, create custom dashboards, and analyze metrics. Testrail also offers reporting features, but the level of customization and flexibility may be limited compared to QMetry.
Test Case Design and Management: QMetry provides advanced features for test case design and management, including test case reuse, version control, and requirements traceability. Testrail, although it offers basic test case management functionalities, may lack some of the advanced features provided by QMetry.
Enterprise-level Test Management: QMetry is designed to cater to the needs of large enterprise teams, offering features like multiple project support, user roles, and permissions management, and integration with other enterprise systems. Testrail is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams, with relatively fewer customization options and limited enterprise-level capabilities.
Test Execution and Scheduling: QMetry provides a centralized test execution and scheduling framework, allowing users to manage test runs, assign test cases to testers, and track progress. Testrail also offers test execution features, but the level of control and scheduling options may not be as comprehensive as QMetry.
User Interface and User Experience: QMetry offers a modern and intuitive user interface, with a focus on enhancing user experience and productivity. Testrail, while functional, may have a more dated or less user-friendly interface compared to QMetry.

In Summary, QMetry offers more extensive integration options, advanced reporting capabilities, comprehensive test case design and management features, enterprise-level support, enhanced test execution and scheduling functionalities, and a modern user interface compared to Testrail.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Testrail	QMetry
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.	It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles
Efficiently manage test cases, plans and runs;Boost testing productivity significantly;Get real-time insights into your testing progress;Integrates with your issue tracker & test automation	TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT; TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT; TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT; TEST DATA MANAGEMENT; DEFECT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; RELEASE & BUILD MANAGEMENT.
Statistics
Stacks 218	Stacks 15
Followers 265	Followers 34
Votes 30	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Designed for testers 6 Easy to use 5 Intutive 5 Easy Intergration 3 Customer Support Cons 4 Pricey	Cons 1 Slow and clunky 1 Some terms and processes are confusing
Integrations
GitHub Jira Visual Studio Pivotal Tracker Bitbucket Lighthouse Mantis Redmine Gemini Bugzilla	TestFlight UserTesting Jira TestNG

What are some alternatives to Testrail, QMetry?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

QMetry vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown code provides a comparison between QMetry and Testrail, highlighting the key differences between the two test management tools.

Integration with Automation Tools: QMetry offers seamless integration with a wide range of automation tools, allowing users to easily execute and manage automated test scripts. Testrail, on the other hand, has limited integration options with automation tools, which may require additional efforts for synchronization.
Reporting and Metrics: QMetry provides comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing users to generate detailed test execution reports, create custom dashboards, and analyze metrics. Testrail also offers reporting features, but the level of customization and flexibility may be limited compared to QMetry.
Test Case Design and Management: QMetry provides advanced features for test case design and management, including test case reuse, version control, and requirements traceability. Testrail, although it offers basic test case management functionalities, may lack some of the advanced features provided by QMetry.
Enterprise-level Test Management: QMetry is designed to cater to the needs of large enterprise teams, offering features like multiple project support, user roles, and permissions management, and integration with other enterprise systems. Testrail is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams, with relatively fewer customization options and limited enterprise-level capabilities.
Test Execution and Scheduling: QMetry provides a centralized test execution and scheduling framework, allowing users to manage test runs, assign test cases to testers, and track progress. Testrail also offers test execution features, but the level of control and scheduling options may not be as comprehensive as QMetry.
User Interface and User Experience: QMetry offers a modern and intuitive user interface, with a focus on enhancing user experience and productivity. Testrail, while functional, may have a more dated or less user-friendly interface compared to QMetry.

QMetry vs Testrail

Overview