Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Rancher vs k3s: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Rancher and k3s
Rancher and k3s are both container orchestration platforms, but they have several key differences.
Architecture: Rancher is built on top of Kubernetes and provides a rich set of features for managing and scaling clusters. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution designed for resource-constrained environments with reduced memory and CPU requirements.
Resource Usage: Rancher requires more resources to run compared to k3s. Rancher's feature-rich nature makes it more suitable for larger-scale deployments where resource availability is not a constraint. Conversely, k3s is optimized for low-resource environments such as edge computing or IoT devices.
Installation Complexity: Rancher installation involves setting up a Rancher server and then creating and managing Kubernetes clusters within it. This requires more steps and configuration compared to k3s, which can be quickly installed with a single command and includes a built-in Kubernetes cluster.
Maintenance and Upgrades: Rancher provides a robust management UI and extensive features for cluster management, monitoring, logging, and more, making it easier to manage and upgrade clusters. On the other hand, k3s offers a minimalistic approach, which can make maintenance and upgrades more hands-on and manual.
Production Readiness: Rancher is widely adopted and has been battle-tested in large-scale production deployments. It offers a mature feature set, extensive ecosystem integrations, and active community support. While k3s is rapidly gaining popularity, it is relatively newer and might not have all the features or ecosystem support needed for highly complex production use cases.
Community and Support: Rancher has a large and active community, with regular releases, updates, and a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and third-party integrations. K3s is also backed by Rancher Labs but being a newer project, it might have a smaller user base and ecosystem support.
In Summary, Rancher is a feature-rich Kubernetes management platform suitable for larger deployments, while k3s is a lightweight, resource-efficient distribution designed for low-resource environments and edge computing.
Pros of k3s
- Lightweight6
- Easy4
- Replication Controller2
- Scale Services2
- Open Source2
Pros of Rancher
- Easy to use103
- Open source and totally free79
- Multi-host docker-compose support63
- Load balancing and health check included58
- Simple58
- Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature44
- Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box42
- Only requires docker37
- Multitenant and permission management34
- Easy to use and feature rich29
- Cross cloud compatible11
- Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure11
- Simple and powerful8
- Next-gen platform8
- Very Docker-friendly7
- Support Kubernetes and Swarm6
- Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)6
- Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes6
- Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments6
- High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/76
- Easy to use service catalog5
- Very intuitive UI4
- IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud4
- Awesome support4
- Scalable3
- Requires less infrastructure requirements2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of k3s
Cons of Rancher
- Hosting Rancher can be complicated10