Ranorex Studio vs Sauce Labs

Overview

Sauce Labs

Stacks314

Followers435

Votes438

Ranorex Studio

Stacks13

Followers13

Votes0

Ranorex Studio vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Integrations: Ranorex Studio offers integrations with various tools and technologies, allowing users to seamlessly integrate their test automation process with CI/CD pipelines and other applications. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity, enabling users to execute their tests in the cloud and access real devices and browsers for testing.
Browser and Device Coverage: Ranorex Studio allows users to test web and mobile applications on a wide range of browsers and devices, ensuring comprehensive test coverage. In contrast, Sauce Labs offers a vast selection of browsers, operating systems, and devices for testing, making it easier for users to test their applications across different platforms.
Collaboration Features: Ranorex Studio provides collaboration features that allow team members to work together on test automation projects, share test scripts, and collaborate effectively. Sauce Labs also offers collaboration capabilities, such as sharing test results, debug logs, and session recordings, promoting teamwork and knowledge sharing among team members.
Performance Testing: Ranorex Studio primarily focuses on functional testing, allowing users to create automated tests for regression testing, data-driven testing, and more. In comparison, Sauce Labs specializes in performance testing, providing features for load testing, stress testing, and performance monitoring to ensure applications perform well under various conditions.
Test Execution Environment: Ranorex Studio allows users to execute tests on local machines, virtual machines, or cloud platforms, providing flexibility in testing environments. Sauce Labs offers a cloud-based test execution environment, enabling users to run tests on real devices, emulators, and simulators in the cloud, ensuring scalability and efficient test execution.
Reporting and Analytics: Ranorex Studio includes comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing users to generate detailed test reports, track test results, and analyze test data. Conversely, Sauce Labs provides advanced reporting features, such as visual test execution reports, performance metrics, and trend analysis tools, helping users gain insights into their test results and make data-driven decisions.

In Summary, Ranorex Studio and Sauce Labs differ in integrations, browser and device coverage, collaboration features, performance testing focus, test execution environments, and reporting and analytics capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, Ranorex Studio

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs	Ranorex Studio
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.	It empowers testers with a complete toolset for end-to-end testing of desktop, web and mobile applications in a single license. Automate tests on a Windows desktop, and then execute them locally or remotely, on real iOS or Android mobile devices or on simulators/emulators.
700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs	Reliable object identification; Broad technology support; Easily maintainable repository; Easy for beginners, powerful for experts
Statistics
Stacks 314	Stacks 13
Followers 435	Followers 13
Votes 438	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Selenium-compatible 46 Webdriver compatible 35 Video recordings of every test 31 Qa 29 Mobile support Cons 2 Expensive 2 Relatively slow	No community feedback yet
Integrations
CircleCI Travis CI Appium Jenkins Selenium Visual Studio AWS Cloud9 TeamCity Applitools Bamboo	Jira Jenkins Firefox Google Chrome Safari Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, Ranorex Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Integrations: Ranorex Studio offers integrations with various tools and technologies, allowing users to seamlessly integrate their test automation process with CI/CD pipelines and other applications. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity, enabling users to execute their tests in the cloud and access real devices and browsers for testing.
Browser and Device Coverage: Ranorex Studio allows users to test web and mobile applications on a wide range of browsers and devices, ensuring comprehensive test coverage. In contrast, Sauce Labs offers a vast selection of browsers, operating systems, and devices for testing, making it easier for users to test their applications across different platforms.
Collaboration Features: Ranorex Studio provides collaboration features that allow team members to work together on test automation projects, share test scripts, and collaborate effectively. Sauce Labs also offers collaboration capabilities, such as sharing test results, debug logs, and session recordings, promoting teamwork and knowledge sharing among team members.
Performance Testing: Ranorex Studio primarily focuses on functional testing, allowing users to create automated tests for regression testing, data-driven testing, and more. In comparison, Sauce Labs specializes in performance testing, providing features for load testing, stress testing, and performance monitoring to ensure applications perform well under various conditions.
Test Execution Environment: Ranorex Studio allows users to execute tests on local machines, virtual machines, or cloud platforms, providing flexibility in testing environments. Sauce Labs offers a cloud-based test execution environment, enabling users to run tests on real devices, emulators, and simulators in the cloud, ensuring scalability and efficient test execution.
Reporting and Analytics: Ranorex Studio includes comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing users to generate detailed test reports, track test results, and analyze test data. Conversely, Sauce Labs provides advanced reporting features, such as visual test execution reports, performance metrics, and trend analysis tools, helping users gain insights into their test results and make data-driven decisions.

Ranorex Studio vs Sauce Labs

Overview