StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. RestSharp vs Swagger Codegen

RestSharp vs Swagger Codegen

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swagger Codegen
Swagger Codegen
Stacks194
Followers163
Votes1
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks6.0K
RestSharp
RestSharp
Stacks743
Followers37
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.8K
Forks2.3K

RestSharp vs Swagger Codegen: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between RestSharp and Swagger Codegen, which are both commonly used tools in web development.

  1. Support for API Documentation: RestSharp is primarily designed as a REST API client, providing a simple and intuitive interface for making API requests. It does not offer built-in support for generating API documentation. On the other hand, Swagger Codegen is focused on the process of generating API documentation from a Swagger specification file. It provides a variety of output formats for the generated documentation, including HTML and Markdown.

  2. Code Generation Capabilities: While both RestSharp and Swagger Codegen can generate code based on API specifications, they differ in their approach. RestSharp generates client-side code that can be used to consume and interact with the API. It handles the low-level details of making HTTP requests and handling responses. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, generates code that includes both client-side and server-side components. It provides not only the client code, but also server stubs that can be used as a starting point for implementing the backend logic.

  3. Language Support: RestSharp is a .NET library and primarily focuses on providing support for .NET-based programming languages, such as C#. It leverages the capabilities of the .NET framework to provide a seamless API integration experience. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, and many more. It aims to be language-agnostic and allows users to generate code in the language of their choice.

  4. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: RestSharp is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It provides a straightforward and intuitive API for making API requests, which can be quickly grasped by developers. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve. It requires users to understand the Swagger specification format and how to customize it to meet their specific requirements. However, once the initial learning curve is overcome, Swagger Codegen provides a powerful and flexible code generation solution.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: RestSharp has been around for quite some time and has a large and active community of developers. It has a well-established ecosystem of third-party libraries, plugins, and extensions, which further enhances its capabilities. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, is part of the larger Swagger ecosystem, which includes tools for API design, documentation, and testing. It benefits from the popularity and widespread adoption of the Swagger specification and has a growing community of contributors.

  6. Integration with API Management Platforms: RestSharp is a generic REST API client and can be used with any API management platform. It does not have built-in integration with specific platforms, but can easily be integrated using standard HTTP request headers and authentication mechanisms. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, provides built-in integration with some popular API management platforms, such as Apigee and Amazon API Gateway. It simplifies the process of generating API documentation and client code that is compatible with these platforms.

In Summary, RestSharp is more focused on providing an easy-to-use REST API client, whereas Swagger Codegen is primarily used for generating API documentation and code, supporting multiple programming languages and offering built-in integration with API management platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Swagger Codegen
Swagger Codegen
RestSharp
RestSharp

It is an open source project which allows generation of API client libraries (SDK generation), server stubs, and documentation automatically from an OpenAPI Specification.

It is probably the most popular HTTP client library for .NET. Featuring automatic serialization and deserialization, request and response type detection, variety of authentications and other useful features

Generate client SDKs in over 40 different languages for end developers to easily integrate with your API; Always updated with the latest and greatest changes in the programming world; Remove tedious plumbing and configuration by generating boilerplate server code in over 20 different languages
Serialization; Sync and Async; Extensive configuration; Authentication; Forms, request body, and files
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
9.8K
GitHub Forks
6.0K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
194
Stacks
743
Followers
163
Followers
37
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    SDK Generation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
JavaScript
JavaScript
Linux
Linux
C++
C++
Perl
Perl
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
TypeScript
TypeScript
Ruby
Ruby
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Swagger Codegen, RestSharp?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope