Reviewable vs Scrutinizer

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Reviewable

17
32
+ 1
23
Scrutinizer

88
65
+ 1
20
Add tool

Reviewable vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Developers describe Reviewable as "GitHub code reviews done right". A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos. On the other hand, Scrutinizer is detailed as "Continuous inspection platform - improve code quality and find bugs before they hit production". Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

Reviewable and Scrutinizer can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.

Some of the features offered by Reviewable are:

  • See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).
  • Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.
  • Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.

On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides the following key features:

  • Continuously measure and track your code quality
  • Project quality broken down
  • Know your problem areas

"Batch commenting" is the primary reason why developers consider Reviewable over the competitors, whereas "Github integration / sync" was stated as the key factor in picking Scrutinizer.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Reviewable
Pros of Scrutinizer
  • 5
    Batch commenting
  • 4
    Makes me feel organised and in control
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Easy incremental reviewing
  • 3
    Efficient comment paging
  • 1
    Manual review of c c++ in eclipse and c# code in vs
  • 1
    Language agnostic
  • 1
    Focused on code reviews
  • 1
    Free for OSS
  • 7
    Github integration / sync
  • 4
    Bitbucket integration / sync
  • 2
    Gitlab integration / sync
  • 2
    Private Git repo sync
  • 1
    Python inspection
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Code review features
  • 1
    Coverage Report changes
  • 1
    Free for open source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Reviewable
Cons of Scrutinizer
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Pricing

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Reviewable?

    A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

    What is Scrutinizer?

    Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Reviewable?
    What companies use Scrutinizer?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Reviewable?
    What tools integrate with Scrutinizer?
    What are some alternatives to Reviewable and Scrutinizer?
    Marvel
    A super simple tool that turns any image (including PSDs) or sketch into interactive prototypes for any device. Powered by Dropbox.
    Buddy
    Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.
    Borg
    It is a deduplicating backup program. It provides an efficient and secure way to backup data. The data deduplication technique used makes it suitable for daily backups since only changes are stored. The authenticated encryption technique makes it suitable for backups to not fully trusted targets.
    Crucible
    It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
    Git
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    See all alternatives