Reviewable vs Scrutinizer

Overview

Scrutinizer

Stacks94

Followers64

Votes20

Reviewable

Stacks17

Followers32

Votes23

Reviewable vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Developers describe Reviewable as "GitHub code reviews done right". A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos. On the other hand, Scrutinizer is detailed as "Continuous inspection platform - improve code quality and find bugs before they hit production". Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

Reviewable and Scrutinizer can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.

Some of the features offered by Reviewable are:

See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).
Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.
Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.

On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides the following key features:

Continuously measure and track your code quality
Project quality broken down
Know your problem areas

"Batch commenting" is the primary reason why developers consider Reviewable over the competitors, whereas "Github integration / sync" was stated as the key factor in picking Scrutinizer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Scrutinizer	Reviewable
Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.	A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.
Continuously measure and track your code quality;Project quality broken down;Know your problem areas;Works fine with legacy code bases	See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).;Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.;Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.;Tracks reviewed files, unreplied / unresolved comments.;Comments map across code changes, never disappear.;Send all comments in one batch, or one at a time.;Open files on the right line directly in your editor.
Statistics
Stacks 94	Stacks 17
Followers 64	Followers 32
Votes 20	Votes 23
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Github integration / sync 4 Bitbucket integration / sync 2 Gitlab integration / sync 2 Private Git repo sync 1 Free for open source Cons 1 Pricing	Pros 5 Batch commenting 4 Makes me feel organised and in control 4 Easy to use 3 Easy incremental reviewing 3 Efficient comment paging
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Scrutinizer, Reviewable?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Reviewable are:

See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).
Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.
Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.

On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides the following key features:

Continuously measure and track your code quality
Project quality broken down
Know your problem areas

"Batch commenting" is the primary reason why developers consider Reviewable over the competitors, whereas "Github integration / sync" was stated as the key factor in picking Scrutinizer.

Reviewable vs Scrutinizer