StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. RuboCop vs TSLint

RuboCop vs TSLint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41
TSLint
TSLint
Stacks3.4K
Followers234
Votes0

RuboCop vs TSLint: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Enforcement of Code Conventions**: RuboCop enforces Ruby code style and conventions, while TSLint focuses on enforcing TypeScript code style and best practices.
2. **Community Support**: RuboCop has a large and active community that continuously updates and maintains the tool, whereas TSLint's community support has declined with the recommendation to move to ESLint.
3. **Integration with Editors**: RuboCop integrates well with popular Ruby editors like Visual Studio Code, Atom, and Sublime Text, while TSLint has integration with TypeScript compatible editors like Visual Studio Code and WebStorm.
4. **Configurability**: RuboCop allows for extensive customization through its configuration files, enabling developers to tailor the tool to their specific project needs. In comparison, TSLint has limited configurability options and has a relatively fixed set of rules.
5. **Language-Specific Rules**: RuboCop offers Ruby-specific rules and guidelines, while TSLint focuses on TypeScript-specific rules and best practices.
6. **Learning Curve**: RuboCop, being specialized in Ruby, may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to the language, whereas TSLint, being specific to TypeScript, may be more approachable for beginners.

In Summary, RuboCop and TSLint differ in their focus on language-specific rules, community support, configurability, and target languages of Ruby and TypeScript, respectively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RuboCop, TSLint

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop
RuboCop
TSLint
TSLint

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

An extensible static analysis tool that checks TypeScript code for readability, maintainability, and functionality errors. It is widely supported across modern editors & build systems and can be customized with your own lint rules, configurations, and formatters.

-
Extensive set of core rules; Custom lint rules; Custom formatters (failure reporters); Configuration presets; Composition; Automatic fixing of formatting & style violations
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
3.4K
Followers
222
Followers
234
Votes
41
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Vim
Vim
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
TypeScript
TypeScript
Atom
Atom
WebStorm
WebStorm
Emacs
Emacs
gulp
gulp
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Grunt
Grunt

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, TSLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana