StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. Sauce Labs vs TestFlight

Sauce Labs vs TestFlight

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestFlight
TestFlight
Stacks1.1K
Followers705
Votes163
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes439

Sauce Labs vs TestFlight: What are the differences?

Comparison between Sauce Labs and TestFlight

In the world of testing, choosing the right tool can make all the difference. Here, we outline the key differences between Sauce Labs and TestFlight, two popular platforms for testing applications.

  1. Type of Testing: One significant difference between Sauce Labs and TestFlight is the type of testing they cater to. Sauce Labs is predominantly used for automated testing of web and mobile applications across various browsers and devices, focusing on compatibility and functionality. On the other hand, TestFlight is geared towards beta testing iOS applications, allowing developers to distribute their apps to testers for real-world feedback before releasing them to the App Store.

  2. Platform Support: Another crucial distinction lies in the platform support offered by Sauce Labs and TestFlight. Sauce Labs provides comprehensive support for testing on various operating systems, browsers, and devices, including desktop, mobile, and virtual environments. In contrast, TestFlight is primarily focused on iOS app testing, specifically designed for iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch devices, making it ideal for developers targeting the Apple ecosystem.

  3. Integration Capabilities: When it comes to integration capabilities, Sauce Labs and TestFlight differ in their approach. Sauce Labs offers robust integrations with popular test automation frameworks like Selenium and Appium, making it seamless for developers to incorporate automated tests into their CI/CD pipelines. On the other hand, TestFlight integrates seamlessly with Xcode and Apple's development tools, providing a streamlined experience for iOS developers to deploy and manage beta builds effectively.

  4. Scalability: Scalability is another key factor that sets Sauce Labs apart from TestFlight. With its cloud-based infrastructure, Sauce Labs offers scalable testing environments that can accommodate varying workloads, allowing teams to execute tests in parallel across multiple devices and browsers efficiently. In comparison, TestFlight is more limited in terms of scalability, primarily designed for smaller-scale beta testing scenarios rather than large-scale automated testing on diverse platforms.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: In the realm of reporting and analytics, Sauce Labs shines with its comprehensive insights into test results, including detailed reports on test performance, browser compatibility, and device coverage. These analytics provide valuable feedback to developers for optimizing their applications. TestFlight, on the other hand, offers basic feedback and crash reports for iOS apps, focusing more on usability feedback from beta testers rather than in-depth testing metrics.

In Summary, when choosing between Sauce Labs and TestFlight, consider your specific testing requirements, platform preferences, and integration needs to determine the best fit for your development workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TestFlight, Sauce Labs

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TestFlight
TestFlight
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Sessions- Discover how testers are using your application. Watch as they progress and take unexpected turns.;Crash Reports- Reported in realtime, with environment snapshots and full session activity.;In-App Questions- The most effective way to get tester feedback. Get the answers you need by asking questions the moment a checkpoint is passed.;Checkpoints- Place checkpoints throughout your app to see how far testers are getting, confirm which areas are popular and reveal ones that need more testing.;Remote Logging- TFLogs are attached to your session and crash reports.;In-App Updates- Prompt testers to install the latest version of your app. This is the easiest way for your testers to take advantage of installing on the fly.
700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
314
Followers
705
Followers
435
Votes
163
Votes
439
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Must have for ios development
  • 49
    Beta testing
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 10
    Easy way to push out updates for internal testers
  • 7
    In-App Updates
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to TestFlight, Sauce Labs?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

HockeyApp

HockeyApp

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

TestFairy

TestFairy

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana