Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Test Studio

Stacks2

Followers17

Votes0

GitHub Stars2

Forks11

Selenium vs Test Studio: What are the differences?

Selenium and Test Studio are both popular automation testing tools used for web application testing. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart. The following paragraphs will highlight the main differences between Selenium and Test Studio.

Language Support: Selenium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, etc., giving testers the flexibility to choose their preferred language. On the other hand, Test Studio primarily supports C# and VB.NET, which might limit the choices for testers who prefer other programming languages.
Cross-browser Testing: Selenium provides extensive cross-browser testing capabilities, allowing testers to verify web applications on various browsers and versions. Test Studio, on the other hand, offers built-in cross-browser testing capabilities but may not have the same level of coverage as Selenium, especially when it comes to newer or less popular browsers.
Integration and Ecosystem: Selenium has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of integrations and plugins available. It can be easily integrated with popular tools like Jenkins, TestNG, Maven, etc., and also supports various testing frameworks. Test Studio, while it does offer some integrations, may not have the same level of flexibility and extensibility as Selenium due to its more closed ecosystem.
Visual Testing: Test Studio offers built-in visual testing capabilities, allowing testers to easily capture and compare screenshots of web applications. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide native visual testing functionality but can be complemented with third-party tools or libraries to achieve similar results.
Record and Playback: Both Selenium and Test Studio support record and playback functionality, allowing testers to quickly generate test scripts without extensive coding knowledge. However, Test Studio tends to offer a more user-friendly and intuitive record and playback experience, making it easier for non-technical testers to create automated tests.
Pricing and Licensing: Selenium is an open-source tool and is free to use, making it a cost-effective option for many organizations. Test Studio, on the other hand, is a commercial tool with a licensing fee, which might be a factor to consider for organizations with budget constraints.

In summary, Selenium offers greater language support, extensive cross-browser testing capabilities, a broader integration ecosystem, while Test Studio provides native visual testing, a more user-friendly record and playback experience, and a commercial licensing model. Individuals and organizations should consider these key differences to choose the tool that best suits their specific testing requirements and constraints.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Oglama™

Testing Frameworks

Oglama

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on Selenium, Test Studio

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	Test Studio
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	It is a Windows-based software testing tool for web and desktop functional testing, software performance testing, load testing and mobile application testing. The tool ships with a plugin for Visual Studio and a standalone app that use the same repositories and file formats.
-	Script-less test recording and playback; Cross-browser test execution – Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari (web browser); Support for HTML, AJAX, Silverlight, WPF and ASP.NET MVC application testing; Element abstraction and reuse.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars 2
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks 11
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 2
Followers 12.6K	Followers 17
Votes 527	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Testrail FogBugz Bugsnag Sentry Jira TestFairy Instabug HipTest

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Test Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.