StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Activity Feeds As A Service
  5. SendBird vs Stream

SendBird vs Stream

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stream
Stream
Stacks290
Followers226
Votes54
SendBird
SendBird
Stacks142
Followers405
Votes78

SendBird vs Stream: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare SendBird and Stream, two popular messaging platforms, and highlight their key differences.

  1. Scalability: SendBird is designed to handle large-scale messaging applications with millions of concurrent users. It provides sophisticated backend infrastructure and global network optimization to ensure reliable and scalable messaging capabilities. On the other hand, Stream also offers high scalability but is more suited for applications with smaller user bases.

  2. Real-time Chat Features: SendBird offers a rich set of real-time chat features, including text messaging, group chats, push notifications, and message threading. It also supports file sharing, read receipts, typing indicators, and various customization options. Stream, like SendBird, provides similar real-time chat features but may lack some advanced functionalities.

  3. API Flexibility: SendBird offers a comprehensive set of APIs that allow developers to customize and extend the messaging platform as per their requirements. Its modular architecture provides flexibility in integrating with other systems and services. Stream, in contrast, provides an easy-to-use API but may have fewer customization options compared to SendBird.

  4. User Engagement and Retention: SendBird provides various engagement features like chatbots, activity feeds, and rich media messages, which can help improve user retention and increase user engagement. Stream, although offering similar features, may have fewer options or a different approach to user engagement and retention.

  5. Cost Structure: SendBird offers pricing plans based on the number of active users, and provides custom enterprise plans for larger organizations. Stream, on the other hand, also offers pricing plans based on the number of monthly active users but may have different pricing tiers and cost structures.

  6. Support and Documentation: SendBird offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and developer resources to support developers during the integration process. It also provides dedicated support channels for customers. Stream also offers documentation and support, but the level of available resources and customer support may vary.

In summary, SendBird and Stream are both powerful messaging platforms with scalability and real-time chat features. SendBird offers greater scalability, advanced customization options, and a comprehensive set of engagement features, while Stream may have more accessible pricing plans and a simpler API. Developers should evaluate their specific needs and compare these key differences to determine which platform is the best fit for their application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Stream
Stream
SendBird
SendBird

Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages.

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Activity, Notification & Personalized Feeds; Real-Time Chat; Multi-Region Support; High Availability; SDKs & Components;
In-app chat experiences users will love; Immersive voice and video experiences; Easy in-app chat support for your customers; Enterprise-ready compliance
Statistics
Stacks
290
Stacks
142
Followers
226
Followers
405
Votes
54
Votes
78
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    It's easy to setup with the minimum coding
  • 18
    Integrates via easy-to-use REST API
  • 18
    Up and running in few minutes
Pros
  • 13
    Active support is impressive. (Support for private deve
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Pre-built UI for major platforms
  • 8
    Migration API for customers using other chat services
  • 7
    Scalability is awesome
Cons
  • 2
    Policy on concurrent users leads to overages and overch
  • 2
    Prices ramp up exponentially
Integrations
Rails
Rails
Django
Django
PHP
PHP
Java
Java
Scala
Scala
Node.js
Node.js
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang
Python
Python
Parse
Parse
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Stream, SendBird?

Chat by Stream

Chat by Stream

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

ChannelizeIO

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

QuickBlox

QuickBlox

Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>

Layer

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community &amp; Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic &amp; fully functional social network.

TalkJS

TalkJS

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

PopcornNotify

PopcornNotify

Popcorn Notify is designed to be an effortless method for sending emails and text messages from your code. Client libraries are simple to install and are available on pip and npm.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope