StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. Serilog vs sqs-s3-logger

Serilog vs sqs-s3-logger

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Serilog
Serilog
Stacks2.1K
Followers107
Votes1
GitHub Stars7.8K
Forks840
sqs-s3-logger
sqs-s3-logger
Stacks0
Followers8
Votes0
GitHub Stars178
Forks8

Serilog vs sqs-s3-logger: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Serilog and sqs-s3-logger, two popular logging frameworks used in software development.

  1. Flexibility: Serilog offers a highly flexible logging infrastructure, allowing developers to customize the output format, sink destinations, and even extend its functionality through various plugins and enrichers. On the other hand, sqs-s3-logger is a more specialized logging framework specifically designed to handle logging in AWS environments, leveraging Amazon S3 and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) for log storage and retrieval.

  2. Integration with AWS services: While both Serilog and sqs-s3-logger support logging in AWS environments, sqs-s3-logger provides seamless integration with AWS services like S3 and SQS. It automatically handles log rotation, compression, and synchronization with S3 buckets, providing an efficient and scalable logging solution in AWS architectures.

  3. Pricing: Serilog is an open-source logging library with no associated costs. Developers can use it freely without any licensing fees. On the other hand, sqs-s3-logger relies on AWS services like S3 and SQS, which have their own pricing models. While the cost may vary depending on usage, using sqs-s3-logger in an AWS environment may result in additional costs compared to using Serilog alone.

  4. Ease of setup and configuration: Serilog is relatively easy to set up and configure with minimal effort. It provides a fluent API for configuring logging options and sinks. On the other hand, sqs-s3-logger requires additional setup and configuration for integrating with AWS services. It involves configuring AWS credentials and setting up S3 buckets, SQS queues, and policies to enable seamless logging using the framework.

  5. Community support and documentation: Serilog has a large and active community of developers, resulting in extensive community support and a wide range of available plugins and enrichers. It also has comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. sqs-s3-logger, being a more specialized logging framework, may have a smaller community and limited documentation compared to Serilog.

  6. Versatility: Serilog can be used in various environments and platforms, including both cloud-based environments like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as on-premises setups. It offers a high level of portability and adaptability. On the other hand, sqs-s3-logger is specifically designed for AWS environments and may not be as versatile when it comes to deployment in different platforms or cloud providers.

Summary

In summary, Serilog offers a flexible and versatile logging infrastructure with extensive community support, while sqs-s3-logger is a specialized logging framework tailored for AWS environments, providing seamless integration with AWS services but may be limited in portability and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Serilog
Serilog
sqs-s3-logger
sqs-s3-logger

It provides diagnostic logging to files, the console, and elsewhere. It is easy to set up, has a clean API, and is portable between recent .NET platforms.

A library to persist messages on S3 using serverless architecture. It is mainly targeted at cheaply archiving low-volume, sporadic events from applications without a need to spin additional infrastructure.

Structured logging; .NET logger
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.8K
GitHub Stars
178
GitHub Forks
840
GitHub Forks
8
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
0
Followers
107
Followers
8
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    It's a logging library
Cons
  • 1
    You can't compare this to seq
  • 1
    They are two different things
No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET
.NET
C++
C++
LogRocket
LogRocket
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda

What are some alternatives to Serilog, sqs-s3-logger?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

ELK

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Sumo Logic

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana