StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. SonarQube vs Stylelint

SonarQube vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986

SonarQube vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

SonarQube vs Stylelint

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Analysis Scope**: SonarQube is a comprehensive tool that performs static code analysis on code written in various programming languages, focusing on code quality, security, and maintainability. Stylelint, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for analyzing CSS stylesheets, checking for declaration order, formatting, and stylistic issues in CSS code.
2. **Configuration Flexibility**: SonarQube offers a wide range of customizable rules and configurations that can be adapted to meet specific project requirements across different programming languages. Stylelint, however, primarily focuses on enforcing best practices and conventions set by the community through specific predefined rules in CSS.
3. **Integration Capabilities**: SonarQube integrates seamlessly with various build tools and continuous integration pipelines to streamline the code analysis process within the development workflow. Stylelint, being more specialized in CSS analysis, may require additional setup and configuration to be integrated into the development pipeline effectively.
4. **Code Quality Metrics**: SonarQube provides detailed reports on code complexity, duplication, bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells to help developers address potential issues and improve code quality. Stylelint, in contrast, primarily focuses on enforcing consistent coding styles and conventions within CSS files to enhance readability and maintainability.
5. **Community Support**: SonarQube has a large community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, plugins, and support for a wide range of programming languages and frameworks. Stylelint, being more focused on CSS analysis, has a smaller but active community that maintains and updates the tool to meet the evolving needs of CSS developers.
6. **Ease of Use**: SonarQube requires a more significant initial setup and configuration process due to its broad scope of analysis capabilities across different languages, potentially requiring more effort to tailor the tool to specific project requirements. Stylelint, being more specialized in CSS analysis, offers a more straightforward setup process specific to CSS files, making it easier to get started with enforcing CSS best practices.

In Summary, SonarQube offers comprehensive static code analysis across multiple programming languages with extensive customization options, while Stylelint specializes in CSS analysis, focusing on enforcing best practices and conventions within CSS stylesheets. Each tool has its strengths in addressing different aspects of code quality and maintainability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SonarQube, Stylelint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stylelint
Stylelint

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
986
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
2.0K
Followers
100
Votes
53
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, Stylelint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana