Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Talos vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Talos and Ubuntu are two operating systems that serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Talos and Ubuntu.
1. Purpose and Target Audience:
Talos is an operating system designed specifically for high-performance computing and data centers. It is optimized for large-scale deployments, delivering maximum performance, and ensuring high availability. On the other hand, Ubuntu is a general-purpose operating system suitable for a wide range of applications and target audiences, including desktop users, servers, and developers.
2. License and Distribution:
Talos is a commercially licensed operating system that is proprietary and requires a subscription to access and use. It is distributed directly by Talos Systems. Conversely, Ubuntu is an open-source operating system that is freely available to download, use, and distribute under the GNU General Public License (GPL).
3. Package Management:
Talos utilizes the RPM Package Manager (RPM) for package management. RPM is a powerful and flexible package management system that allows for efficient installation, upgrading, and removal of software packages. Conversely, Ubuntu employs the Advanced Package Tool (APT), which is a user-friendly and efficient package management system that works with Debian packages (deb files).
4. Support and Updates:
Talos provides enterprise-level support and guarantees long-term support options for its subscribers. It offers regular updates, security patches, and custom kernel releases. Conversely, Ubuntu offers a wide range of support options, including community support and commercial support through Canonical. Ubuntu also provides regular updates and security patches for both the desktop and server versions.
5. System Requirements:
Talos is designed to run on specific hardware architectures, primarily IBM POWER9 systems. It takes full advantage of the capabilities and features of these systems, including the ability to handle massive parallel processing and advanced workload management. In contrast, Ubuntu supports a wide range of hardware architectures, including x86, ARM, and PowerPC. It is more versatile and can run on various devices and systems.
6. Default Desktop Environment:
Talos does not include a default desktop environment as it is primarily built for server and data center use cases. It focuses on performance and stability rather than providing a graphical user interface. Conversely, Ubuntu offers several desktop environments, with GNOME being the default. Ubuntu provides a user-friendly and visually appealing interface for desktop users.
In Summary, Talos is a specialized operating system for high-performance computing and data centers, distributed under a proprietary license with optimized performance and availability, using RPM package management and requiring a specific hardware architecture. Ubuntu, on the other hand, is a general-purpose open-source operating system suitable for various applications and target audiences, distributed freely under a GNU GPL, using APT package management, supporting multiple hardware architectures, and offering different support options and desktop environments.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Talos
- Immutable OS1
- API managed1
- Secure1
- Lightweight1
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Talos
- Relatively new1
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1