StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Test Management
  5. TestLodge vs Zephyr

TestLodge vs Zephyr

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestLodge
TestLodge
Stacks12
Followers35
Votes0
Zephyr
Zephyr
Stacks62
Followers115
Votes1

TestLodge vs Zephyr: What are the differences?

Introduction

In comparing TestLodge and Zephyr, it is essential to identify key differences to make an informed decision on which test management tool to choose.

  1. Integration Capabilities: TestLodge offers integrations with various popular tools such as Jira, Asana, Trello, and Slack, providing seamless collaboration and productivity. On the other hand, Zephyr provides integrations with Jira and Confluence, focusing more on enhancing the functionality within the Atlassian ecosystem.

  2. Customization Options: TestLodge allows users to customize test plans, suites, and cases to fit specific project requirements efficiently. In contrast, Zephyr offers extensive customization options not only for test cases but also for test cycles, execution, and reporting, providing more flexibility in managing testing processes.

  3. User Interface: TestLodge boasts a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for teams to quickly adopt and utilize the platform without extensive training. Comparatively, Zephyr offers a more complex interface with a steeper learning curve, requiring more time and effort for users to become proficient in navigating the tool.

  4. Reporting and Analytics: TestLodge provides comprehensive reporting capabilities with real-time insights into test progress, results, and trends, enabling teams to make data-driven decisions effectively. In contrast, while Zephyr also offers reporting features, the depth and customization options in reporting may not be as robust as TestLodge.

  5. Cost Model: TestLodge follows a simple and transparent pricing model with a per-user subscription fee, making it easier for teams to predict and manage testing costs. Conversely, Zephyr's pricing structure can vary based on the number of users, test cycles, and additional features, potentially leading to more unpredictable costs for organizations.

  6. Platform Compatibility: TestLodge is a web-based tool accessible on various platforms, including desktop and mobile devices, ensuring seamless testing activities from anywhere. Zephyr, primarily integrated within the Atlassian ecosystem, may have limitations on platform compatibility outside of this environment, restricting flexibility for teams working on diverse setups.

In Summary, TestLodge and Zephyr offer distinct features in integration, customization, UI, reporting, cost model, and platform compatibility, enabling teams to choose the tool that best aligns with their testing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestLodge
TestLodge
Zephyr
Zephyr

A user-friendly, productive online test case management tool to manage your testing efforts in a simple, streamlined way.

Manage all aspects of software quality; integrate with JIRA and various test tools, foster collaboration and gain real-time visibility.

Build a suite of test cases using our simple interface, or import existing test cases from a spreadsheet.;Input requirements and see which ones have been verified which ones haven’t.;Build a suite of test cases using our simple interface, or import existing test cases from a spreadsheet.;We guide you through each test, where you can mark it as passed, failed, or skipped.
Agile; Automation; DevOps; Analytics
Statistics
Stacks
12
Stacks
62
Followers
35
Followers
115
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Good integration with JIra
Cons
  • 3
    Slow UI
  • 2
    Doesn’t add much value to non-Jira users
  • 2
    Lack of bulk edit operations for test runs
  • 2
    Slower performance
  • 2
    Lack of debugging insights
Integrations
FogBugz
FogBugz
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Redmine
Redmine
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
YouTrack
YouTrack
Axosoft
Axosoft
monday.com
monday.com
Trello
Trello
ClickUp
ClickUp
Linear
Linear
Jira
Jira
Trello
Trello
Bamboo
Bamboo
Confluence
Confluence
Zapier
Zapier

What are some alternatives to TestLodge, Zephyr?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

SentinelQA

SentinelQA

CI failures are painful to debug. SentinelQA gives you run summaries, flaky test detection, regression analysis, visual diffs and AI-generated action items.

AgileTest: Test Management For Jira

AgileTest: Test Management For Jira

AgileTest is a test management tool for Jira, providing full-featured requirements, defects & test management, Ad-hoc test & QA Checklist.

TestLink

TestLink

It is a web-based test management system that facilitates software quality assurance. The platform offers support for test cases, test suites, test plans, test projects and user management, as well as various reports and statistics

Allure Report

Allure Report

It is a flexible, lightweight multi-language test reporting tool. It provides clear graphical reports and allows everyone involved in the development process to extract the maximum of information from the everyday testing process.

qTest Management

qTest Management

It is a test management software used by the small as well as large-scale organization. It helps to create a centralize test management system for easy communication and rapid deployment of the task to QA teams and developers.

QMetry

QMetry

It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles

PractiTest

PractiTest

It is an easy-to-use Test Management solution for professionals, allowing users to have all testing information in one central location.

Applause

Applause

It is the worldwide leader in crowd testing and digital quality, helping leading companies deliver quality digital experiences that customers love.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana