StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. TestCafe vs Testsigma

TestCafe vs Testsigma

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestCafe
TestCafe
Stacks262
Followers273
Votes26
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks678
Testsigma
Testsigma
Stacks8
Followers29
Votes0

TestCafe vs Testsigma: What are the differences?

Introduction: TestCafe and Testsigma are both popular automated testing tools used for web applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Programming Language Support: TestCafe allows testers to write tests in JavaScript or TypeScript, while Testsigma offers support for Java and Python in addition to JavaScript. This provides flexibility for teams with diverse coding skill sets.

  2. Maintenance Effort: TestCafe has a simpler setup and does not require additional plugins or dependencies, making it easier to maintain. On the other hand, Testsigma uses AI-powered testing which can reduce the effort required for test maintenance.

  3. Parallel Execution: TestCafe supports parallel test execution out of the box, allowing for faster test completion. Testsigma also offers parallel execution but requires additional configuration for running tests concurrently.

  4. Browser Compatibility: TestCafe supports all major browsers without requiring any additional setup, ensuring cross-browser compatibility. Testsigma also supports multiple browsers but may require additional configuration for certain scenarios.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: TestCafe provides basic test reports while Testsigma offers detailed test analytics and insights, empowering teams to make data-driven decisions based on test results.

  6. Integration Capabilities: TestCafe can be easily integrated with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, etc., for seamless automation. Testsigma provides integrations with tools like JIRA, Slack, etc., enhancing collaboration and workflow efficiency.

In Summary, TestCafe and Testsigma differ in terms of programming language support, maintenance efforts, parallel execution, browser compatibility, reporting capabilities, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestCafe
TestCafe
Testsigma
Testsigma

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

A Unified platform for Web, Mobile apps and API services' Automated Testing, It is test automation ecosystem with all the essential elements required for Agile & Continuous Delivery teams. Automated tests are written in simple English & involves no complex coding but with the flexibility that enterprise teams need. The tests can be run in parallel on thousands of device/OS/browser combos and physical mobile devices on a massive device cloud as well as on your local machines. It lets you drill down to specific test environments and identify what failed and why.

Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development
AI-Driven Maintenance; Automated Regression Testing; Automated Data-Driven Testing; Automated Cross-Browser Testing; Automated Web Application Testing; Automated Mobile Apps(Android & iOS)Testing; Automated Web Services Testing; Reusable Step Groups; Test Data Management; Activity, history of your tests; Centralized Object/Element Repository; Global Test Data Management; Custom Functions; Parallel Test Execution; Cross-Platform Testing; Massive Real devices' cloud; Local Test Executions; Schedulers; Comprehensive Visual Reports; Integration with CI/CD tools, Collaboration tools; Test Management; Requirements Management; Team Collaboration; Test Development Trend; Version Control; Automatic Bug Reporting; Email and Slack Notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
678
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
262
Stacks
8
Followers
273
Followers
29
Votes
26
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
Cons
  • 9
    No longer free
No community feedback yet
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins
Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity
Linux
Linux
iOS
iOS
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android OS
Android OS
CircleCI
CircleCI
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Jira
Jira
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to TestCafe, Testsigma?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana